Bombay High Court held that exporters are entitled to both input side and output side rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and not just one kind of rebate. Thus, present writ petition allowed.
Neptune Petrochemicals penalized ₹1.19 lakh for issuing shares in physical form in violation of Section 29 of the Companies Act for 109 days.
Bombay High Court permitted audio-video appearance before investigating officer for recording of statement in view of Economic Offences Wing’s (EOW) directions to withhold the renewal of the petitioner’s passport. Accordingly, petition stands allowed.
Delhi High Court didn’t entertained the appeal filed by the Customs Department since the quantum of alleged wrongly availed drawback and penalty there on was too negligible. Accordingly, writ disposed of.
Mumbai Customs Authority for Advance Rulings classifies CM3K65HP1, a zinc oxide mixture for sun protection, under CTH 3304 as a skin preparation.
Delhi High Court held that petitioner was not aware about the GST SCN uploaded on ‘Additional Notices Tab’, accordingly, order passed in absence of the reply is liable to be quashed. Notably, 30 days time given to petitioner to furnish reply.
Recurring accounting errors in non-corporate financials and audit assignment limits for Chartered Accountants are outlined, impacting reporting accuracy.
Delhi High Court held that bail granted in fraudulent ITC generated and passed by the respondent is upheld since there was no pending investigation. Re-arrest of respondent is unwarranted since he has fully cooperated in investigation.
A guide to GST on residential and commercial property rent/lease in India, explaining RCM, FCM, applicability based on party types, and compliance.
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 27.08.2024 passed by the respondent. It is mainly contested that all notices/communications were uploaded by the respondent in the GST common portal.
