Explore the case of Saraswati Knitwear Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chandigarh) regarding interest on excess duty paid for clearing yarn. Discover the CESTAT’s decision.
Delhi High Court closes appeals as Assessing Officer’s income tax addition stands despite a pending Special Leave Petition.
Delhi High Court’s judgment regarding the income tax refund for Assessment Years 2020-21 and 2021-22, after an inquiry by CBDT, and the need for timely remittance.
The Delhi High Court sets aside a reassessment order related to alleged bogus purchase claims, citing the need for proper evidence and defense for the assessee.
CESTAT Kolkata rules that service tax is not applicable to rent received for immovable property services prior to June 2007. Details of the case and the verdict explained.
Delhi High Court grants relief to Amadeus IT Group, condoning a 170-day delay in re-filing an Income Tax Appeal. Details of the case and the court’s decision.
ITAT Mumbai upheld the application of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act on excess share premium arising from a loan to equity conversion. Learn more about the case.
Delhi High Court directs the Assessing Officer to furnish relevant material supporting allegations of fictitious loan in the case of Rakesh Kumar Mohindroo vs. ITO for AY 2019-20.
CESTAT Chennai rules no demand can survive against composite works contract contracts prior to 01.06.2007 in the case of Mertho Constructions vs. Commissioner of Central Excise.
CESTAT Chennai rules transporters in mines not considered Goods Transport Agency (GTA) without consignment notes, dismissing Service Tax liability for Ramco Cements.
