CESTAT Chandigarh held that that waste, gums, fatty acids etc. arising during the course of manufacture of vegetable oils are eligible for the exemption Notification No.89/95-CE dated 18.09.1995.
In the case of Pearls Buildwell Infrastructure Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, CESTAT Chandigarh quashes service tax demand due to insufficient evidence.
In BOKS Business Services Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of CGST, Delhi, court rules that calling a party an agent in an agreement doesn’t necessarily make them an intermediary for GST purposes.
Dive into world of social audits with SAS 1600, focusing on migrant and displaced persons’ welfare. Explore process, evaluation, and impact assessment.
Explore SEBI (LODR) Regulations 2015, discover their applicability, and get acquainted with essential terms like Specified Securities and Listed Entities. These regulations promote transparency in the stock exchange.
Explore Madras High Court case involving director accountability, falsification, and legal complexities under Companies Act. Discover implications of judgment.
Unlock secrets of cost audits with our comprehensive FAQ guide. Learn about selection, remuneration, applicability, and more. Stay compliant and informed.
ITAT Delhi held that as per India-USA DTAA provision of consultancy services cannot be treated as FIS merely because the service provider while providing consultancy services had used substantial technical skill and expertise.
CESTAT Delhi held that refund of excise duty paid on Henna Powder and Henna Paste in terms of notification no. 11/2017-CE (NT) dated 24.04.2017 rejected as refund claim was not filed within a period of six months from the date of issuance of notification.
ITAT Kolkata held that the assessee has no permanent establishment in India and these services were also rendered outside India but the services has been used in India and, therefore, it is taxable in India.
