Bail granted after considering various factors like applicant already paid INR 54.09 Crores; the amount of INR 196,57,02,539/- is already seized by the department; applicant has already spent more than 8 months in jail; applicant has not previous criminal history; etc.
Held that the training fee paid by the assessee to a professional trainer doesn’t amount to Fees for Technical Services and hence TDS u/s 195 not deductible
Held that show cause notice to initiate proceedings u/s. 201(1) is issued on 20.11.2012 which is beyond four years with respect to assessment years 2007-08 & 2008-09. Accordingly, interest levied u/s 201(1A) unsustainable.
Held that the pouches of Maha Pasand Jarda Scented Tobacco describes the product as chewing tobacco and in Trade Parlance also it is known as Chewing Tobacco only. Hence, the same is classified as chewing tobacco and not jarda scented tobacco
Price of any commodity in the economy is tied to multiple variables. Price should never be seen in silos but within the context of various factors. Similarly, the price of listed companies in the share market is a play of domestic, national, and international influences that companies can’t ward off.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi Notification No. 74/2022 – Customs (N. T.), Dated: 9th September, 2022 G.S.R. 692(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 156 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and in supersession of the Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty) Rules, 2017, except as […]
Sky Airways Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Customs Duty Paid Voluntarily During Investigation cannot be claimed as refund when CESTAT remanded the matter for a fresh adjudication The Hon’ble Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (CESTAT) in the matter of Sky Airways v. Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi [Final Order […]
Bombay HC held that appeal proceedings are extension of assessment and Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal’s Judgment accepting C Forms is upheld.
In the present complaint, Opposite Parties have tampered with original MRP Price of oil sachet and charged extra amount more than MRP.
Reasonable quantum of cash available out of past savings should be considered as being available to assessee to explain source of cash deposited in bank
