Case Law Details
Case Name : Tej Ram Dharam Paul Vs Commissioner of Central Goods (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Tej Ram Dharam Paul Vs Commissioner of Central Goods (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Held that the pouches of ‘Maha Pasand Jarda Scented Tobacco’ describes the product as ‘chewing tobacco’ and in Trade Parlance also it is known as ‘Chewing Tobacco’ only. Hence, the same is classified as chewing tobacco and not jarda scented tobacco
Facts-
The issue involved in this appeal relates to classification of the goods manufactured i.e. ‘Maha P
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.