Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tej Ram Dharam Paul Vs Commissioner of Central Goods (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 60336 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/08/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tej Ram Dharam Paul Vs Commissioner of Central Goods (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Held that the pouches of ‘Maha Pasand Jarda Scented Tobacco’ describes the product as ‘chewing tobacco’ and in Trade Parlance also it is known as ‘Chewing Tobacco’ only. Hence, the same is classified as chewing tobacco and not jarda scented tobacco

Facts-

The issue involved in this appeal relates to classification of the goods manufactured i.e. ‘Maha Pasand Jarda Scented Tobacco’ by the appellants as to whether that product is chewing tobacco classifiable under heading 24039910 as claimed by the appellants or its jarda scented tobacco classifiable under heading 24039930 as claimed by the revenue?

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031