Case Law Details
Case Name : Tej Ram Dharam Paul Vs Commissioner of Central Goods (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tej Ram Dharam Paul Vs Commissioner of Central Goods (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Held that the pouches of ‘Maha Pasand Jarda Scented Tobacco’ describes the product as ‘chewing tobacco’ and in Trade Parlance also it is known as ‘Chewing Tobacco’ only. Hence, the same is classified as chewing tobacco and not jarda scented tobacco
Facts-
The issue involved in this appeal relates to classification of the goods manufactured i.e. ‘Maha Pasand Jarda Scented Tobacco’ by the appellants as to whether that product is chewing tobacco classifiable under heading 24039910 as claimed by the appellants...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

