Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Voluntary deposit made during investigation & appropriated against demand cannot be treated as pre-deposit & thus cannot be refunded

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2022 taxguru.in 4069
Case Name
Sky Airways Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Sky Airways Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

Customs Duty Paid Voluntarily During Investigation cannot be claimed as refund when CESTAT remanded the matter for a fresh adjudication

The Hon’ble Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (CESTAT) in the matter of Sky Airways v. Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi [Final Order No. 50715 of 2022 dated August 12, 2022] dismissed the appeal stating that the amount deposited voluntarily during the investigation cannot not be treated as an amount towards the pre-deposit and refunded as the same was appropriated against the demand.

Facts:

Sky airways (Appellant) voluntarily deposited Rs. 3,00,82,889/- during investigation however, a show cause notice dated August 03, 2009 (SCN) was issued to the Appellant to show cause as to why Rs. 3,00,82,889/- should not be demanded.

The SCN was adjudicated, and order dated May 19, 2010 was passed confirming the demand and appropriating Rs. 3,00,82,889/- against the demand. The Appellant being aggrieved filed an appeal before the Hon’ble CESTAT and the demand was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh order in the light of the directions issued by the Hon’ble CESTAT with a direction to the parties to maintain the status quo.

Subsequently, the Appellant filed a refund claim on October 16, 2017 for refund of Rs. 3,00,82,889/- which was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner vide the order-in-original dated March 19, 2018 (“the OIO”) and upheld by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) (“the Respondent”) vide order-in-appeal dated June 17, 2019 (“the OIA”). Being aggrieved present appeal has been preferred by the Appellant.

The Appellant contended that the voluntarily deposit of Rs. 3,00,82,889/- made during the investigation, should be treated as a pre-deposit amount and should be refunded as the appeal filed by the Appellant was allowed by the Hon’ble CESTAT.

Issue:

Whether or not the claim of refund will be sustainable merely on the ground that it was pre-deposit deposited during the investigation stage?

Held:

The Hon’ble CESTAT in Final Order No. 50715 of 2022 dated August 12, 2022, held as under:

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,916

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.