Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of existing ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- Bank Notes in terms of which the banks are required to report daily position on exchange of SBN to RBI.
In order to avoid any inconvenience to foreign tourists, Authorized Persons may issue Pre-paid instruments to them in terms of the instructions issued by Department of Payments and Settlement System, Reserve Bank of India, in exchange of foreign exchange tendered. Passport may be treated as a valid document for issuance of the said documents.
Governments Departments may be allowed to draw cash beyond the stipulated limit of ₹ 10,000/-, in exceptional cases, only on production of evidence justifying their cash requirements in writing,
The Government has taken a bold step to demonetize Rs. 500 and Rs.1,000 notes; While it is a step in the right direction, a few steps would need to be taken to not only ensure that people holding black money in cash are not able to convert it into white
RBI has brought to the notice of IBA that Government has expressed concern that banks are not following direction issued by RBI in relations to deposit of cash and are insisting that depositors should disclose the source of cash deposit.
Government extends existing exemptions with rergard to cancellation of the legal tender character of the existing series of high denomination bank notes of Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 denominations until the expiry of 14th November, 2016
On-a-days lot of messages are been circulated on social media that cash deposited in a bank may attract tax and penalty of 200%, I have tried to explain the provisions of Income Tax Act 1961 in this respect.
Central Government vide Notification No. S.O. 3408(E) dated 08.11.2016 specified that bank notes shall not be ceased to be legal tender, with effect from the 9th November, 2016 until the 11th November, 2016, to the extent of transactions specified below, namely:— (a) for making payments in Government hospitals for medical treatment and pharmacies in Government […]
Oppugning legality, validity and correctness of the order dated 10-2-2014 passed by the trial Court (judicial authority) in Civil Suit No. 207-A/2013 by which that Court in exercise of power conferred under Section 8(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called as the ‘AC Act, 1996’) relegated the parties to arbitration finding prima facie valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties and the dispute to be capable of settlement by arbitration, these two revision petitions have been preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, one by the plaintiff and another by defendant No. 1 Bank stating the impugned order to be unsustainable in law. [Parties will hereinafter be referred as per their status shown in the suit before the trial Court.]
Section 27 of the draft model GST laws prescribes requirements as to filing of Returns under the GST regime.
