Follow Us:

Archive: 2013

Posts in 2013

Seeks to amend notification No. 75/2005-Customs, dated the 22nd July, 2005 so as to make editorial changes in column (2) of S. No. 118, to align it with HS 2012

March 1, 2013 453 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act,1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the

Transaction which would otherwise may have been exempt u/s. 10(38) cannot be said to be involving ‘treaty shopping’

March 1, 2013 684 Views 0 comment Print

If income arises out of the transfer of a long term capital asset being an equity share in a listed company, the said income would be exempt under section 10(38) of the said Act. There is no doubt that the shares of Goodyear India Limited are listed shares and therefore even if a consideration had been charged for the transfer of the 74% share, the income arising therefrom would be exempt by virtue of the provisions of section 10(38) of the said Act.

Notification No. 9/2013-Customs – Dated- 1st March 2013

March 1, 2013 1398 Views 0 comment Print

Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 69/2004- Customs, dated the 9th July, 2004, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 411(E), dated the 9th July, 2004, namely :-

Mode of recovery of CENVAT credit wrongly taken, under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 -Reg

March 1, 2013 792 Views 0 comment Print

The principle rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), dated 10st September, 2004, vide Notification No. 23/2004-Central Excise (N.T.), dated the 10st September 2004,vide number G.S.R. 600(E), dated the 10th September, 2004 and last amended vide Notification No.28/2012 Central Excise (N.T) dated the 20th June, 2012, published in the Gazette of India

Reg. provision for interest on refund arising out of order of final assessment

March 1, 2013 652 Views 0 comment Print

Seeks to further amend the notification No. 4/2002-CE (N.T.), dated 1st March, 2002 so as to make provision for interest on refund, subject to sub-rule (6), arising out of an order of final assessment under sub-rule (3) of rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002

Additional interest paid by Bank Assessee on some FDRs be allowed as deduction

March 1, 2013 561 Views 0 comment Print

As far as the assessee’s claim on payment of additional interest is concerned, while confirming the Assessing Officer’s view that the payments were contrary to the RBI guidelines, the First Appellate Authority as well as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that all that the assessee could pay as per the RBI guidelines was 8% interest only and any amount paid over and above the permissible limit was against the public policy, hence, hit by Explanation 237 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. As far as this line of reasoning is concerned, we find from the Circular issued by the RBI that there is ceiling on interest payable in current account/saving bank account and discretion is available on interest to be paid on term deposits. The circular reads as under:-

Regarding MRP based assessment with 35% abatement thereon, for branded medicaments

March 1, 2013 13482 Views 0 comment Print

Medicaments exclusively used in Ayurvedic, Unani, Siddha, Homeopathic or Bio-chemic systems, manufactured in accordance with the formulae described in the authoritative books specified in the First Schedule to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act

Transaction once accepted as genuine in assessment can’t be raised in reassessment proceedings

March 1, 2013 657 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee disclosed capital gain and claimed exemption under section 54F on the ground that entire sale proceeds were invested in construction of house property. In the original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer, denied exemption on ground that construction of house property was complete before the date of transfer of shares.

Transaction with sister concerns at a comparatively low price not sufficient ground to reject Books

March 1, 2013 8033 Views 0 comment Print

The primary condition for rejecting the book results as laid down under section 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is that the Assessing Officer should be satisfied that the books of account maintained by the assessee are not complete and correct. As can be seen from the findings given by the Assessing Officer in the order of assessment, the Assessing Officer has merely proceeded on a surmise that the profits of the assessee are sought to be reduced by selling its products to M/s. Pragathi Automation P. Ltd., the assessee’s sister-concern at a lesser price.

Deduction u/s. 80-IB(10) not dependent on manner of profit distribution among AOP members

March 1, 2013 1173 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee AOP in the present case has been assessed as AOP and found to have fulfilled the condition laid down in section 80 IB(10) and has been held to be eligible for such deduction. The quantum of deduction under section 80 IB (10) will depend on the income earned from eligible project. The quantum of deduction will not depend upon the mode of distribution of shares amongst the members of AOP as income of AOP is taxable at maximum marginal rate.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930