"25 May 2013" Archive

Superintendent of Service Tax & An Income Tax Inspector jailed in Bribery case

The special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore has convicted Sri A. Vanangamudi, then Superintendent of Service Tax, Service Tax Commissionerate, Bangalore to undergo two years Simple Imprisonment with fine Rs.20,000/- in a bribery case. The investigation revealed that Sri A. Vanangamudi, Superintendent of Service Tax was caught red handed wh...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

UIDAI launches Aadhaar based Iris Authentication, eKYC, One Time PIN

UIDAI launches Aadhaar based Iris Authentication, eKYC, One Time PIN New Services and Permanent Enrolment Centres Developing on its vision of ‘Empowering residents of India with a unique identity and a digital platform to authenticate anytime, anywhere’, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) today unveiled thre...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Filling up of the post of Indirect Tax Ombudsman at Ahmedabad

DOR F. No. A.12026/18/2011-Ad.I (25/05/2013)

I am directed to say that the post of Indirect Tax Ombudsman at Ahmedabad in the HAG + pay scale of Rs.75500-80,000/-, is likely to be filled up from amongst the officers of the Indian Customs & Central Excise Service....

Read More

Assessment u/s. 153A can be made only on the basis of incriminating material found during search

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vs Ms. Asha Kataria (ITAT Delhi)

We have carefully considered the submissions and perused the records. We find that the value of the property in this case as reflected in the registered sale deed was Rs. 55,00,000/-. Reference u/s. 142A was made to the DVO by the Assessing Officer....

Read More

No Interest disallowance for amount advanced without interest out of Interest free funds

Income Tax Officer Vs Shri Anand Prakash Gupta (ITAT Delhi)

In this case Assessing Officer noted that from the perusal of the balance sheet and Annexures it was noted that the assessee has taken loans from banks, amounting to RS. 8,32,93,610/- in the form of secured loan and also from other parties, amounting to Rs. 56,20,479/-...

Read More

S. 2(22)(e) not applies to amount advanced for investment on behalf of company

Income Tax Officer Vs Adarsh Kapoor (ITAT Delhi)

the stand of the assessee has been that a sum of Rs. 12,00,000/- was given to the assessee company, consequent upon the Resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the said Company authorizing the assessee to invest on behalf of the company in units of M/s Reliance Equity Advantage Funds....

Read More

No penalty for mere disallowance u/s.40(a)(ia) of expenses claimed

Tanushree Basu Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

In the present case, admittedly, assessee made a claim but the same was rejected and disallowed not for the reason that the claim was not genuine or was fabricated but in view of provisions of law that assessee did not deduct TDS thereon. ...

Read More

ITAT allows Sub-Brokerage expenses against Real Estate Commission Income

Smt. Renu Sudesh Kapoor Vs The DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

The figures regarding earning of commission and sub-brokerage have already been mentioned in the above part of this order. The assessee has furnished full details regarding properties in respect of which she has earned commission income. ...

Read More

Featured Posts