Attention is invited to the entry at Code No. 1701 of Table ‘ B’ of Schedule 2 and Sr. No. 25 of Schedule 2 Appendix-1 of the book titled “ ITC(HS) Classifications of Export and Import Items, 1997-2002” ( incorporating amendments made upto 31.8.1998 ) and as amended from time to time specifying the terms and conditions for export items indicated therein.
it is clarified that, as a matter of rule, no evidence of actual duties suffered or imported or indigenous nature of inputs, even if the All Industry Rate has customs portion, should be insisted upon by the field formations alongwith declaration filed by exporters under Rule 12(1) (a) (ii) of the Customs & Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995.
The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide notification No. 3/2001-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2001 [G.S.R. 128 (E), dated the 1st March, 2001.
Custodians may, thereafter, use the same containers to bring back LCL imports to various ICDs/CFSs. As regards consolidation of imported LCL cargo at the gateway port (or a CFS near gateway port) and subsequent transhipment to inland ICDs/CFSs, following procedure
The large scale pendency of Bills of Entry and Shipping Bills at most of the Custom Houses is a cause of serious concern. Apart from the fact that the pendency of Bills of Entry has a direct bearing on revenue collection, this has also given rise to a number of complaints, and puts the department in a poor light.
In accordance with the aforementioned circulars dated May 29, 2000 and October 16, 2000, out of the 280 scrips required to establish connectivity with both the depositories by March 26, 2001, 129 companies have now established connectivity.
For the purposes of this notification, “rate of exchange” applicable for the purposes of calculation of anti-dumping duty shall be the rate which is specified in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), issued from time to time, in exercise of the powers under sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962).
Circular No.574/11/2001-CX A Divisional Assistant Commissioner had passed an order in original dated 16.2.1993 classifying the product in question under sub heading No.3823.00 on the grounds that mixtures of Fluron-11 and Fluron-12 are not separate chemically defined organic compounds. The Audit objected the classification on the grounds that the product are classified under sub-heading No.2903.10 as on mixing of these two compounds
Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, read with rules 13 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995.
in the matter of import of Zinc Oxide, falling under heading No. 28.17 or sub-heading No. 3812.30 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), originating in, or exported from the People’s Republic of China, the designated authority vide its preliminary findings, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 7th March, 2001.
