Please refer to our earlier circular no. SMDRP/Policy/cir-23/2000 dated May 29, 2000 advising inter alia the list of companies for compulsory settlement of trades in dematerialised form for all investors.
F.No. 345/7/2000-TRU It is directed to draw your attention to the recent amendments made in the Central Excise Rules, 1944 allowing the assessees to discharge their duty liability on fortnightly basis. Representations have been received in this regard, whereby some of the assessees have expressed their desire to continue to pay the excise duty on consignment basis.
For the purposes of this notification, “rate of exchange” applicable for the purposes of calculation of the anti-dumping duty shall be the rate which is specified in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), issued from time to time in exercise of the powers under sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and the relevant date for the determination of the “rate of exchange” shall be the date of presentation of the “bill of entry” under section 46 of the said Customs Act.
The Circulars mentioned in the preceding paragraph were issued in regard to clearance of goods stored in a custom bonded warehouse by adjusting custom”s duty in a DEPB scrip. Representations have been received for further extention of the said facility in view of extension of the said facility in view of extension of DEPB Scheme to customs stations notified under DEPB scheme vide
I am directed to invite your attention to the Board”s Circular No. 55/2000-Cus., dated 30th June, 2000 on above mentioned subject. The said circular was issued to create HUBs near gateway ports where the LCL acrgo brought from various ICDs/CFSs will be reworked and thereafter sent to various destinations directly. In regard to the procedure contained in the said circular following
Circular No. 541/37/2000-CX The Tribunal vide Final order No.39/2000-D dated 4.1.2000 reported in 2000 (38) RLT 170 (CEGAT) in the case of Guru Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Delhi had decided that the car seat covers – whether of “Leather” or “Textile” are accessories and classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 8708.00.
Notification No 11461-Income Tax Whereas the Convention between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of Japan for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income has come into force on the 29th Dec., 1989 after the exchange of instruments of ratification as required by paragraph 1 of Article 28 of the said Convention and the said convention has been notified in G.S.R. 101(E) dt. 1st March, 1990
Notification No 753(E)-Income Tax Whereas the Convention between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of Japan for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income has come into force on 29th December, 1989, after the exchange of instruments of ratification as required by paragraph 1 of article
In exercise of the powers conferred under Paragraph 4.11 of the Export & Import Policy 1997-2002, the Director General of Foreign Trade hereby specifies the quantitative ceiling on export of Sugar for the licensing year 2000-2001.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in fact the respondents had no Jurisdiction to seize the trucks and he has claimed damages. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is correct. It has been repeatedly held by several Division Benches of this Court that trucks cannot be seized under the U. P. Trade-tax Act e.g., in the case of M/s. D. B. Timber Merchant, Ballia v. Commissioner of Sales-tax and another, 1992 UPTC 18, M/s. M. S. Freight Carriers and another v. Sales Tax Officer, Check Post, Ghaziabad, 1992 UPTC 273, M/s. Freight Carriers of India, Calcutta v. Deputy Commissioner (Executive), Sales Tax, Ghaziabad and others, 1992 UPTC 604, etc.
