Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 were notified on 26th May, 1995 specifying time limit for filing claims for drawback. Rule 13(1) of the said rules provided that a claim should be filed within three months from the date relevant for applicability of the amount or rate or drawback in terms of sub-rule (3) of rule 5. Accordingly in case of goods exported by Sea or Air, a drawback
I am directed to draw attention to the letter of the Confederation of Export Units, pointing out some ambiguity about the status of EOU / EPZ units in the interim period between the completion of the initial period of approval and actual approval to continue as an EOU. In this regard it is clarified that Section 65 of Customs Act 1962 would adequately cover their case if they wished to continue the
The undersigned is directed to refer to the provisions of notification no. 64/94 Customs dt. 1.3.94 under which complete WOEGs are charged a concessional duty of 25% under S.No. 1 whereas under S.No. 3 ibid, specified parts of the same imported for manufacture of WOEGs are extended Nil rate of duty
Circular No. 175/9/96-CX I am directed to say that doubts have been expressed regarding eligibility of fat liquors for concessional rate of duty in terms of Notification No. 12/94-CE dated 1.3.94 as amended by Notification No. 14/95-CE dated 16.3.95.
Representations have been received by the Board that benefit of certain exemption notification are being denied by the Customs Houses / Commissionerates on the ground that the goods, wile being covered by the description specified under the notification, do not fall in the Capters/ Heading/ Subheading Nos. (herein after referred to as Tariff references) mentioned in the notification. In this
Circular No. 736-Income Tax Representations have been received from the various quarters regarding applicability of the provisions of section 194-I of the Income-tax Act to the sharing of the proceedings of film between film distributor and a film exhibitor owning a cinema theatre.
I am directed to say that Notification No. 83/95- Customs dated 31st March, 1995 was issued amending eight customs Notifications viz: Notification Nos. 13/81- Cus. dated 9.2.1981, 138/91 – Cus. dated 22.10.1991, 140/91- Cus. dated 22.10.1991, 95/93-Cus. dated
I am directed to enclose1 herewith a copy of Ministry of Commerce’s letter No. 6/13/95 – EP (Agri-II) dated 10th November, 1995 along with its enclosures on the above subject and to request that necessary instructions may please be issued to all concerned not to stop export of HPS Groundnut (both in shell and Kernels), Sesame seeds, safflower seeds (Kardi seed) etc. for consumption purposes.
It has been represented by various Export Promotion Councils and Associations viz. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority, New Delhi, and All India Food Preservers’ Association, New Delhi, seeking the clarification as to whether in the existing All Industry Rate of Drawback for Food/ Fruit preparations and products falling under chapter 16, 20 and 21 of
Circular No. 174/8/96-CX It has been brought to the notice of the Board that the different practices are followed by the Commissionerates regarding verification of refund vouchers & re-concilitation of refunds sanctioned in respect of Central Excise Duties.
