G.S.R. 105 (E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 93/2009-Customs, dated the 11th September, 2009 published in the Gazette of India
In the said notification, in paragraph 2, in condition (a), in the second proviso, serial number (xix) and the entries relating thereto shall be deleted..
If the assessee does not have turnover for some or all the units in the preceding financial year, the last quarter for which details of turnover of all the units are available, previous to the month or quarter for which credit is to be distributed
G.S.R. 107 (E).– In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 6/2013-Service Tax, dated the 18th April, 2013 published in the Gazette of India
The Public Notice No.47 dated 18.5.2011, inter alia, had deleted ‘Actual User’ condition for imports under Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) Scheme. This was challenged before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in WAMP No. 447 of 2012 in WA No. 228 of 2012. The Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh had passed an interim order on 04.04.2012 (in para 30) as under:“ …………we grant interim relief prayed for by the appellant and hold that till the disposal of the writ petition the Public Notice No. 47 (RE-2010/2009-14 dated 18.5.2011 does not delete the Actual User condition on the import of maize (corn)(other than seed).
Government Urges all Tax Payers to Disclose Their True Income and Pay Appropriate Taxes; Income Tax Department Conducts the Second Round of Data Matching Identifying New 21.75 Lakh Potential Non-Filers and Information About Them Made Available on the ‘Compliance Module’ on E-Filing Portal of the Department
The constitutional validity of the amendment to section 2(24) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 was challenged by the Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and others by way of the Writ Petition bearing number 2022 of 2007 filed before the Hon Bombay High Court.
Earlier it was administratively decided that if an Audit Report in form 704 for the period 2012-13 pertaining to developers (other than those opting for composition scheme) is filed within one month from the due date i.e. on or before 15th February 2014, then penalty under section 61(2) of the MVAT Act, 2002 shall not be imposed.
In the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, in Schedule B, (1) in entry 1, (i) in column (2), the words, figures and letters sold during the period starting on or after the 1st April, 2013 and ending on the 31st March, 2014 shall be deleted;
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (Mah. IX of 2005), the Government of Maharashtra hereby with effect from the 1st April 2014 amends the SCHEDULES A and C appended to the said Act, as follows, namely.
