In re Ms. Opto Electronic Factory (GST AAR Uttarakhand) Classification and Rate of applicable GST on various equipment manufactured for being used exclusively in various armoured Tanks. We observe that the products manufactured and reapired by the applicant i.e. ‘Sight Vision Equipment’ is nothing but an ‘optical instruments’ used in various types of armoured tanks […]
In re Ms. Elefo Biotech Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Uttarakhand) In the present application, applicant has sought advance ruling for the classification and rate of GST applicable on supply of the products i.e. Anaerobic Microbial Inoculums (AMI)’ manufactured by them. AAR held that that the products i.e. Anaerobic Microbial Inoculums (AMI) will be classified under […]
In re M/s. Saro Enterprises (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) In the case at hand, the product, ‘Agricultural Seedling Tray’, is made up of Plastics and not of any of the base metals specified in the section notes as stated by the Appellant themselves. The contention of the Appellant is that the trays are used for germination […]
Disallowance under section 43B could not be done in respect of provision for gratuity made for the benefit of the employees for the reason that no actual payment was made.
We do not have any hesitation is holding that when the addition is made solely on the basis of statement the third party and revenue does not have any other evidences, then without granting opportunity of cross examination , such addition cannot be made.
M/s. Johns Biwheelers Vs. ACIT (ITAT Cochin) In this case, the assessee was required to get his books of account audited and filed along with the return of income u/s. 44AB within the due date of 30/09/2013 for the assessment year 2013-14. However, the audit report was furnished only on 28/03/2014. The contention of the […]
K. Sashidhar Vs Indian Overseas Bank & Ors. (Supreme Court of India) In the present case, however, we are concerned with the provisions of I&B Code dealing with the resolution process. The dispensation provided in the I&B Code is entirely different. In terms of Section 30 of the I&B Code, the decision is taken collectively […]
Merely because the sale price is fixed through a negotiated settlement will not take away the proceedings from the Land Acquisition Act when the relevant provision of the Act are invoked.
The learned AR also accepted the legal position that mandatory pre-deposit can be made through the CGST Credit. In view of this fact, we are of the opinion that the objection raised by the Registry is not tenable
Smt. Roopa Vs ITO (ITAT Bengalore) ITAT held that assessee’s claim for exemption u/s 54/54F of the Act in respect of 2 flats in the same residential building complex is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Smt. K. G. […]
