Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an employee cannot be denied TDS credit merely because the employer failed to deposit the tax deducted from ...
Income Tax : Employers must file Form 138 quarterly for salary TDS reporting. Timely filing ensures accurate tax credit to employees and avoids...
Income Tax : Form 102 provides a mechanism to claim TDS credit where deduction and income reporting occur in different years. It ensures taxpay...
Income Tax : Understand eTDS return corrections, the six-year revision limit, and challenges in claiming TDS credit. Learn how tax adjustments ...
Income Tax : Learn how the new Income Tax Rule 134 and Form 71 offer relief for taxpayers facing TDS credit mismatch. Discover the procedure, b...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that TDS credit cannot be denied where the employer deducted tax but failed to deposit it. Recovery must be made ...
Income Tax : ITAT directed the AO to verify Form 26AS and the corresponding income before deciding the TDS credit claim instead of denying it o...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that tax demand cannot be raised against an employee where TDS was deducted from salary but not deposited by th...
Income Tax : The ITAT ruled that deduction of TDS does not excuse failure to file an income tax return. The decision emphasizes that income dis...
Income Tax : The key issue was whether the absence of corresponding entries in Form 26AS justified denial of TDS credit. The ITAT held that emp...
Income Tax : Instruction No. 01/2012 The issue of processing of returns for the Asst. Year 2011-12 and giving credit for TDS has been considere...
Income Tax : INSTRUCTION NO. 2/2011 The issue of processing of returns for Asst. year 2010-11 and giving credit for TDS has been considered by ...
The case examined whether tax authorities could deny working capital adjustment despite clear prior directions of the Tribunal. The ITAT held that such directions are binding and must be implemented in letter and spirit. Once the adjustment was granted, the assessee’s margin fell within the permissible arm’s length rang
ITAT held that once tax is deducted from an employee’s income, credit cannot be denied merely because the employer failed to deposit it. Section 205 bars recovery of such tax from the employee.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that Form 26AS is not conclusive when deduction of tax is otherwise established. Denial of TDS credit would amount to double taxation, which Section 205 expressly prohibits.
The ITAT held that taxing only TDS credit, while leaving the underlying undisclosed commission untaxed, is a patent error. Section 263 revision was rightly invoked to protect revenue.
The Allahabad High Court, in U.P. Rajya Nirman Sahakari Sangh Limited vs Union of India, quashed a tax recovery notice, holding that an assessee must be given credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) if they provide valid Form 16A certificates, even if the amount is not reflected in Form 26AS.
Understand eTDS return corrections, the six-year revision limit, and challenges in claiming TDS credit. Learn how tax adjustments impact deductees.
Tribunal in the case of Yegneswari General Traders vs. ITO has held that based on CBDT circular no. 452 it is clear that Kaccha Arahtias turnover includes only the gross commission and not the sales effected on behalf of their principals.
Explore crucial rulings in case of Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt Ltd vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding CSR expenditure disallowance and TDS credit allowance, along with detailed analysis.
In the case of Salesforce.com Singapore Pte Ltd. vs ACIT, ITAT Delhi ruled that receipts from CRM services aren’t taxable in India as royalty or FTS under the Income-tax Act or India-Singapore DTAA.
Even if income of Non-resident on which tax is deducted, is not taxable in India, credit is to be given for TDS on such income and excess TDS is to refunded to taxpayer.
