Income Tax : Employers must file Form 138 quarterly for salary TDS reporting. Timely filing ensures accurate tax credit to employees and avoids...
Income Tax : Form 102 provides a mechanism to claim TDS credit where deduction and income reporting occur in different years. It ensures taxpay...
Income Tax : Understand eTDS return corrections, the six-year revision limit, and challenges in claiming TDS credit. Learn how tax adjustments ...
Income Tax : Learn how the new Income Tax Rule 134 and Form 71 offer relief for taxpayers facing TDS credit mismatch. Discover the procedure, b...
Finance : Navigate TDS rates and compliances for FY 2023-24 onwards. Learn about TDS payment due dates, late fees, interest, penalty, prosec...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT held that once receipts reflected in Form 26AS are assessed as taxable income, corresponding TDS credit cannot be deni...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that a clerical mistake in quoting TAN cannot result in denial of TDS credit when Form 16 and Form 26AS clearly...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that the limitation period for appeal commenced only when the assessee first received the ITBA screenshot revea...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore set aside the appellate order denying TDS credit after the assessee produced Form 16A and Form 26AS showing deduction ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that TDS credit cannot be denied merely because it does not appear under the assessee’s PAN. It ruled that the...
Income Tax : Instruction No. 01/2012 The issue of processing of returns for the Asst. Year 2011-12 and giving credit for TDS has been considere...
Income Tax : INSTRUCTION NO. 2/2011 The issue of processing of returns for Asst. year 2010-11 and giving credit for TDS has been considered by ...
Form 102 provides a mechanism to claim TDS credit where deduction and income reporting occur in different years. It ensures taxpayers do not lose legitimate credit.
The Tribunal admitted additional evidence where TDS credit was denied because it appeared in a different assessment year’s Form 26AS. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify documents and allow credit as per law.
The dispute concerned denial of TDS credit citing inconsistencies in reported transaction values. The ruling clarified that Form 26AS is decisive for TDS credit when deduction and deposit are undisputed.
The Tribunal held that where income is offered to tax on receipt basis, TDS credit must be granted in the same year despite timing differences arising from accrual-based deduction by clients.
The case examined whether tax authorities could deny working capital adjustment despite clear prior directions of the Tribunal. The ITAT held that such directions are binding and must be implemented in letter and spirit. Once the adjustment was granted, the assessee’s margin fell within the permissible arm’s length rang
ITAT held that once tax is deducted from an employee’s income, credit cannot be denied merely because the employer failed to deposit it. Section 205 bars recovery of such tax from the employee.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that Form 26AS is not conclusive when deduction of tax is otherwise established. Denial of TDS credit would amount to double taxation, which Section 205 expressly prohibits.
The ITAT held that taxing only TDS credit, while leaving the underlying undisclosed commission untaxed, is a patent error. Section 263 revision was rightly invoked to protect revenue.
The Allahabad High Court, in U.P. Rajya Nirman Sahakari Sangh Limited vs Union of India, quashed a tax recovery notice, holding that an assessee must be given credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) if they provide valid Form 16A certificates, even if the amount is not reflected in Form 26AS.
Understand eTDS return corrections, the six-year revision limit, and challenges in claiming TDS credit. Learn how tax adjustments impact deductees.
