Follow Us:

Shivali Bardoliya

Latest Articles


Back Office Support Services are Taxable and not Exports- Maharashtra AAR

Goods and Services Tax : Facts: Vservglobal Private Limited (hereinafter ‘Applicant’) is engaged in providing back office support services to overseas ...

November 27, 2018 6027 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Slot Charter Operation will be Included in Deemed Tonnage even if ship is not qualifying ship

Income Tax : Trans Asian Shipping Services Private Limited Vs. CIT ( kerala High Court) It was held in the case of the income derived from slot...

October 18, 2015 892 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty U/s 271C exigible if delay in remittance of TDS for Unreasonable Cause

Income Tax : It was held by Kerala High Court in the case of Classic Concepts Home India Private Limited V/s. CIT that, penalty U/s 271C is exi...

October 16, 2015 2662 Views 0 comment Print

Delayed Payment of Employees’ Contribution to PF not allowable U/s 43B

Income Tax : It was held in the case of CIT v/s South India Corporation Ltd. by Kerla High Court That the assessee is not entitled to claim ded...

September 17, 2015 11285 Views 0 comment Print

Settlement Application cannot be admitted without considering objections raised by CIT

Income Tax : It was held by Hon’ble High Court of Bombay and Goa in the case of CIT V/s M/s Sai Prasad Properties Limited that an application...

September 12, 2015 795 Views 0 comment Print

S. 147 Objections of assessee cannot be disposed off on an Imaginary Ground

Income Tax : In was held by High Court of Bombay and Goa in the case of M/s V M Salgaoncar Sale International V/s ACIT, that objections raised ...

September 12, 2015 1824 Views 0 comment Print


Section 153C not applicable in absence of satisfaction recorded in the case of person searched that document belongs to the Assessee

July 19, 2015 1669 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of Ms. Meena Rani Vs. ACIT, It was held by ITAT Delhi that If no satisfaction note has been recorded in the records of the searched persons but in the records of the assessee, assessment cannot be done U/s 153C

Addition cannot be made for mere non presence of purchaser of land before AO

July 14, 2015 1132 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of ITO Vs. Sh. Mahender Singh, ITAT Delhi has held that addition cannot be made for Cash deposits in the bank account received against sale of land as undisclosed investment for mere failure of Assessee to Produce

Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031