Follow Us:

section 254

Latest Articles


Third Proviso to Section 254(2A) of Income Tax Act is Arbitrary & Unconstitutional

Income Tax : The three-judge bench of Supreme Court of India in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Pepsi Foods Ltd struck dow...

June 7, 2021 4512 Views 0 comment Print

Prosecution – made more simpler for revenue

Income Tax : A perusal of this order reveals that the Tribunal has recorded a finding that it is empowered by Section 254 of the Act to stay pr...

October 31, 2015 3100 Views 0 comment Print


Latest News


Provide Shorter Time For Rectification Of Mistake by Tribunal

Income Tax : The existing provisions of Section 254(2) provide for a time-limit of four years from the date of the order of the Appellate Tribu...

January 19, 2016 1348 Views 1 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Remand Report Accepting Assessee’s Explanation Bars Additions: ITAT Delhi

Income Tax : ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, holding that additions could not survive after the AO’s remand report accepted the ...

July 10, 2026 69 Views 0 comment Print

Section 250(6) Mandates Speaking Appellate Orders After Adequate Hearing: ITAT Jaipur

Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur set aside an ex parte CIT(A) order for non-compliance with Section 250(6) and remanded the appeal for fresh decision o...

July 8, 2026 174 Views 0 comment Print

Returned Income Must Be Accepted When Fresh Assessment After ITAT Remand Is Time-Barred: Bombay HC

Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that failure to pass a fresh assessment within Section 153 limitation required acceptance of the returned i...

July 4, 2026 207 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Quashes Assessment as Final Order Was Passed Beyond Section 144C(13) Time Limit

Income Tax : ITAT held the assessment time-barred as the AO failed to pass the final order within the mandatory timeline under Section 144C(13)...

June 30, 2026 153 Views 0 comment Print

No disallowance of quantified liabilities, documented payments & reconciled books on a purely ad hoc basis

Income Tax : Provisions that were typically restricted or viewed as contingent become fully deductible business expenses the moment they were q...

June 30, 2026 129 Views 0 comment Print


Section 254(2) Non-consideration of decisions is mistake apparent from law

April 18, 2019 7023 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Private Ltd Vs Addl. CIT (TDS) (ITAT Hyderabad) We have perused the order of the Tribunal and find that in Para 8 of the order, the Tribunal has considered the applicability of sub-section (3) of section 201(1) also to 201(1A) and has clearly held that sub section (3) refers only to an […]

MA is maintainable only if appeal is pending and not admitted

March 15, 2019 19677 Views 0 comment Print

Shri Ratanlal C. Bafna Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) When appeal has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court, the appeal is admitted and substantial question of law has been framed in the said appeal, then the Tribunal cannot recall the order. In the present case since the appeal against the order of the Tribunal has […]

S. 254 Miscellaneous petitions filed after 6 months from ITAT order date is barred by limitation

November 5, 2017 12093 Views 0 comment Print

Question of rectification of mistake cannot be entertained until and unless the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the assessee is found to be maintainable. The miscellaneous petitions filed by the assessee are beyond the period of 6 months from 1-6-2016 and therefore the same are barred by limitation.

Amendment U/s. 254(2): Six month time limit for rectification is Prospective

November 3, 2017 5481 Views 0 comment Print

The Amendment Under Section 254(2) In Respect Of Time Limit Of Six Months For Rectification Is Prospective And Applicable To The Orders Passed After 01.06.2016

Sec. 254(2) amendment applies to orders passed after 01/06/2016

October 29, 2017 2094 Views 0 comment Print

These Miscellaneous Applications are filed by the assessee seeking rectification of mistake apparent on the record in the order dated 06/09/2013 passed by the Tribunal while disposing of bunch of appeals filed by the department.

There can be no tax liability without the authority of law : ITAT Mumbai

September 9, 2017 1929 Views 0 comment Print

This appeal by assessee u/s 253 of Income Tax Act (the Act) is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-15, Mumbai dated 16.10.2012 for Assessment Year 2007-08. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal

Tribunal cannot condone delay in filing Miscellaneous Application

August 3, 2017 2952 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal has been given power to admit an appeal after the expiry of the relevant period, if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not presenting it within that period as per Section 253(5). However, this Tribunal is not enshrined with such powers in respect of a miscellaneous petition filed u/s 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. If we are not given that power, then it is not expected from us to exercise such power which is not provided in the Act.

ITAT clarifies period of limitation for filing rectification application U/s. 254(2)

July 29, 2017 17733 Views 0 comment Print

Section 254(2) of the Act refers to the period of limitation reckoning from the end of the month in which the order is passed and not from the date of ‘date of receipt of the served/ received are not interchangeable and the Legislature in its wisdom expressly used the phraselogy depending on the intention. In the instant case, the expression passed cannot be stretched to mean that the period of limitation should be reckoned from the date of receipt of the order.

Section 254(2) cannot be applied to seek review of ITAT order

February 28, 2017 2148 Views 0 comment Print

By section 254(4) of the IT Act, an order which has been passed by the Tribunal reaches finality the moment the same is passed: it cannot be touched thereafter. By section 254(2) of the act, the Tribunal, however, has been authorized to rectify mistakes in its orders, which are apparent on the face of the records.

Tribunal recalled order having mistake apparent from record

February 12, 2017 3993 Views 0 comment Print

These bunch of miscellaneous applications have been filed by different assessees viz., Reliance Communications Ltd., (formerly known as Reliance Infocom Ltd.), Reliance Communications Infrastructure Ltd., Reliance BPO Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Reliance Infostream Pvt. Ltd.) and Reliance Telecom Ltd.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031