Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata condoned appeal delay, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and remanded the assessment for fresh adjudication after grantin...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that a 50-year lease is not a transfer under Section 2(47)(vi) where the transaction is only a lease and not an a...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad allowed Section 10(10B) exemption on BSNL VRS compensation, following coordinate bench rulings despite no claim in ...
Income Tax : ITAT held an assessment passed after the taxpayer's death was invalid in law, quashed the order, and treated all remaining issues ...
ITAT Ahmedabad rules a 29-day delay in filing Form 10DA is a procedural lapse, not a bar to claiming an 80JJAA deduction, overturning a ₹92.6 lakh disallowance.
Once assessee had filed the Return of Income, in response to notice, u/s 142(1), (although it was late), then it was mandatory for AO, in order to acquire the jurisdiction, to make the assessment on the assessee, to issue the notice u/s 143(2).
ITAT Nagpur held that co-operative society is eligible to claim deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act in respect of interest earned from credit facilities extended to nominal members. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Jaipur held that reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued by the Assessing Officer [AO], having no jurisdiction, is invalid. Accordingly, assessment order and consequent proceeding are also invalid.
ITAT Mumbai rules cash deposits in SBNs during demonetization, with explained sources, cannot be treated as unexplained income, citing judicial precedents.
ITAT Chennai holds reassessment notice under Section 148 for AY 2013–14 as time-barred, relying on Supreme Court’s ruling in Rajeev Bansal and other precedents.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes arbitrary disallowances under Section 40A(2)(b), emphasizing AO’s burden to prove excessiveness in related party transactions.
ITAT Bangalore held that expansion of scope of limited scrutiny without obtaining required prior approval as directed under CBDT Order No. F.No.225/402/2018/ITA.II dated 28.11.2018 is bad-in-law and hence order of AO is liable to be quashed.
Mumbai ITAT held that CIT(A) cannot dismiss Mechanically an appeal solely on delay grounds without adjudicating the issues raised on merits. Tribunal condoned delay after noting that the assessee’s father had passed away and directed fresh disposal on merits.
Tribunal remanded the matter after finding that the appellate authority dismissed the appeal mechanically without examining the assessee’s grounds.
