This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Explained SBN Deposits During Demonetization Not Unexplained Income: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Goldman Tapes Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Goldman Tapes Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, has delivered a significant ruling in the case of Goldman Tapes Private Limited Vs. ACIT, allowing the assessee’s appeal and directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to delete an addition of Rs. 44,61,000 made on account of cash deposits during the demonetization period (Assessment Year 2017-18). The Tribunal emphasized that a genuine explanation for the source of cash, even if in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) after the demonetization announcement, cannot be rejected merely because the SBNs ...





