Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that satisfaction for initiating action against other persons in search cases must be recorded promptly. ...
Income Tax : The High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 were time-barred after computing the surviving limitation as clar...
Income Tax : Budget 2026 introduces sweeping retrospective amendments affecting limitation, reassessment jurisdiction, DIN validity, and TPO ti...
Income Tax : The new reassessment framework mandates enquiry, hearing, and a reasoned order before reopening. Courts now test jurisdiction on p...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Corporate Law : Non- extension of the Time Barring Date for assessment of reopened cases and issuance of the notices for reopening – difficu...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Jharkhand High Court held that retrospective insertion of Section 147A removed the jurisdictional challenge against reassessme...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : The Court held that the petitioner had no connection with the entities or individuals from whose devices the disputed material was...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
Delhi ITAT sets aside reassessment notices against Sampark Management Consultancy LLP, citing invalid sanction post-Finance Act, 2021, and lack of proper authority approval.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed an appeal by Mukul Mahanta challenging an income tax assessment, directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within 30 days.
Punjab & Haryana High Court invalidates reassessment notices for Assessment Year 2015-16, citing limitation bar based on Supreme Court precedent.
Rajasthan High Court directs ITO to consider the Supreme Court’s Rajeev Bansal precedent regarding expired limitation periods for AY 2015-16 tax notices.
ITAT Mumbai sets aside reassessment for advocate Nilanjana Arvinder Singh (AY 2013-14, 2014-15), ruling Section 148 notices time-barred. Decision follows Supreme Court’s Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal rulings on reassessment limitation.
ITAT Raipur cancels reassessment for Vinay Agrawal (AY 2014-15 & 2015-16) due to time-barred Section 148 notices. Decision relies on Supreme Court rulings in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal.
ITAT Raipur sets aside reassessment order for Kachrulal Jitendra Kumar, ruling the Section 148 notice time-barred. Cites Supreme Court judgments in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal on reassessment limitation.
Bombay High Court sets aside Section 148 tax notice for Caishen Enterprise LLP, ruling it invalid as it was not issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer.
ITAT Raipur set aside ex-parte order passed by CIT(A) since the reason for non-compliance by the assessee before CIT(A)/NFAC was that the hearing notices have been sent in the wrong email id by the department. Accordingly, matter of accommodation entries remanded back to CIT(A).
Bangalore ITAT cancels reassessment proceedings against Amit Kumar Banthia (HUF) due to the Assessing Officer’s failure to follow mandatory procedures.
