Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Malkiat Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Malkiat Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Half-share, half-truth – AO’s wrong assumption of ₹ 1 cr sale kills jurisdiction- escaped income below ₹ 50 lakh bars extended time under s. 149(1)(b)- Reassessment u/s 147 quashed as notice issued beyond 3-year limit – Assessee challenged the order of NFAC dated 16.06.2025 upholding reassessment for A.Y. 2017-18. AO had issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 09.02.2024 alleging escapement of income based on information of sale of immovable property of ₹ 1.02 crore, purchase of property ₹ 32.20 lakh, &  TDS receipts ₹ 79,200. Assessment was complete...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930