Income Tax : Article explains important Income Tax Return (ITR) filing due dates for Financial Year 2025-26 relevant to different categories of...
Income Tax : Avoid common AY 2026-27 ITR filing errors, including deadline confusion, capital gains mistakes, AIS mismatches, and missed e-veri...
Goods and Services Tax : The case examined if income details could be disclosed under RTI during a matrimonial dispute. The Court ruled that such disclosur...
Income Tax : ITR-4 Sugam: End of Blind Presumptive Compliance?” The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has introduced a significant complia...
Income Tax : Highlights that selecting the incorrect portal tab can lead to data mismatches and filing errors. Emphasizes the need to use the c...
CA, CS, CMA : The Court found CBDT failed to follow its 2015 directive on timely ITR utility release. It ordered an affidavit with corrective st...
CA, CS, CMA : KSCAA urged CBDT to extend due dates for assessees under Section 92E, citing an omission in Circular No. 15/2025 that created inco...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : The Pune Chartered Accountants' Society has requested an extension for tax audit and ITR filing deadlines for FY 2024-25, citing t...
Income Tax : The case addresses the continued failure to release ITR utilities on time despite earlier court directions. The Court adjourned th...
Corporate Law : The court interpreted the scope of Section 91 CrPC in summoning documents. It ruled that parties cannot demand documents as a matt...
Income Tax : The case focuses on systemic delays and technical shortcomings in the e-filing system. The Court directed the Department to file a...
Service Tax : The case addresses whether discrepancies between ITR/Form 26AS and ST-3 returns can justify a Service Tax demand. The Tribunal hel...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the assessee had furnished PAN, bank statements, confirmations, and financial details establishing the iden...
Income Tax : CBDT clarified the presentation of error categories in Form U. The update ensures clearer reporting of incorrect income heads and ...
Income Tax : The corrigendum corrects technical errors in multiple ITR schedules, including CG and CYLA. It ensures accurate reporting and smoo...
Income Tax : CBDT corrected multiple clerical and structural errors across income tax return schedules. The changes ensure accurate reporting a...
Income Tax : The corrigendum fixes an incorrect aggregation formula in Schedule CG and wrong cross-references in Schedule UD. It ensures accura...
Income Tax : The corrigendum addresses formatting and reference errors in Schedule CG and Schedule OS. It clarifies reporting fields without al...
Verify your Form 26AS before filing your ITR for FY 23-24. Ensure accurate TDS and avoid discrepancies for a smooth tax return process.
Learn about different types of income tax returns (ITR) for salaried employees: ITR 1, ITR 2, ITR 3, and ITR 4. Understand which form suits your income structure best.
Discover when to start filing ITR for salaried individuals for FY 2023-24. Waiting until June 15 ensures accurate data and avoids mismatch notices.
ITAT Jaipur directs AO to quash Assessment Order under section 143(3) of Income Tax Act as notice to deceased assessee is deemed invalid. Detailed analysis and case precedents provided.
Read the detailed analysis of Delhi HC judgment quashing Income Tax Notices issued under Section 148A(b) and 148. Learn why the court ruled against the Revenue.
ITAT concluded that the service of notice under Section 148 was improper and did not meet statutory requirements. Consequently, the reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid, and the assessment order was quashed as void ab initio.
Delhi High Court ruling: Assessing Officer cannot assume jurisdiction under Section 147 of Income Tax Act without proper grounds. Detailed analysis and judgment.
Discover ITAT Bangalore’s directive on re-evaluating depreciation disallowance claimed on asset acquisition in the case of ACIT vs. Raghavendra Educational for the assessment year 2016-17.
ITAT Kolkata rules in favor of Sati Promoters Pvt. Ltd., deleting Rs. 1.98 Cr Section 68 addition due to AO’s reliance on non-production of subscribing company directors.
The ITAT Bangalore rules in favor of GSSS Credit Co-operative Society Limited, allowing interest income from co-operative banks to qualify for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).
