ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) should not be decided before disposal of the related quantum appe...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that two sale deeds represented the same transaction because one was merely an amendment correcting a survey num...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that CPC cannot suo motu reclassify an apartment owners association as a co-operative society while processing...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that an appeal dismissed ex-parte by NFAC should still be decided on merits under Section 250 of the Income Tax Ac...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT held that the appellate authority failed to consider pending writ petitions and interim directions of the Bombay H...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The ld. Senior DR stated that the assessee has not elaborated how the assessee’s health condition was not viable for filing of appeal or there is no supporting evidence for the reason that the assessee’s health condition was not proper. Hence, he stated that the delay of […]
The assessee categorically denied receipt of rent over and above what is reflected in its books of accounts. Nothing has been brought on record to contradict the version of the assessee either by the learned AO or by the learned CIT(A). We, therefore, hold that rental income which has not been received by the assessee cannot be brought to tax.
In the present case we find that the entire addition is on the basis of some investigation report, the relevant portions of which is also not cited in the show cause or the assessment order, there is nothing against the assessee and no inquiry whatsoever has been done by the AO or the Ld CIT (A).
Mamania Family Trust Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) With regard to the substantial issue of treating the assessee as AOP as against the status of a private discretionary trust as ‘individual’, we are of the considered view that the Ld. CIT(A) has rightly decided the issue in the light of various judicial decisions. The Ld. CIT(A) […]
Chemetall Rai India Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The only question is about the denial of depreciation on two categories of Intangible assets, namely, Non-compete fees and Market information comprising of Commercial information, Customer data, Distribution network and Suppliers contract. Apart from the assessee acquiring the Chemical business of Gramos Chemicals India Limited, it transferred […]
In the present case, the main reason for treating the land as non-agricultural is that the land was converted for usage of non-agricultural purposes. However, the assessee filed revenue records wherein it is stated that the land still continued to be agricultural land wherein crops like Ragi & Paddy were cultivated by the assessee.
Hon’ble Bombay HC, in the case of DIT v/s Besix Kier Dabhol, has held that the Revenue has no power to re-characterize a transaction entered into by the Assessee. Therefore admittedly, the AO or the TPO are not empowered to convert and re-characterize a transaction of share application into a loan transaction.
ACIT Vs Late Sh. Amarjeet singh (ITAT Delhi) Facts- The assessee is an individual and deriving income from property, share income as partner in M/s S.M. & Sons and M/s Santokh Singh & Sons and interest income. The assessee filed its return of income on 30.09.2011 declaring an income of Rs.19,27,700/-. Subsequently, the assessee revised […]
Kooud Software Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Facts- The assessee is a private limited company. AO has passed the orders u/s 200A(1) the Act levying late fee towards the delay in filing the TDS returns u/s 234(E) of the Act for the A.Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15. Conclusion- On the basis of the decision of […]
It is well established that the reasons recorded by the AO cannot be further be substituted or added or deleted. We are of the view that the reference to market value of the flat as determined by stamp duty valuation authority also cannot justify initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Act, as the validity of reassessment has to be tested only on the basis of reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer before issuing notice under section 148 of the Act and those reasons cannot be further improved.
