ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT held that the appellate authority failed to consider pending writ petitions and interim directions of the Bombay H...
Income Tax : The ITAT Chennai held that exemption under Section 11 cannot be denied merely because Form 10B was not filed along with the return...
Income Tax : The ITAT Bangalore held that gains arising from buyback of shares are taxable under Section 46A because the conditions prescribed ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that incomplete WhatsApp chats without proof of completed transactions cannot justify additions under Section 69A...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty under Section 271AAC cannot survive once the underlying Section 153C assessment is quashed. The Tribu...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
M.R. Enterprises Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Admittedly, in the present case the assessment was reopened on the basis of cash deposited in the bank account and no addition has been made by the Assessing Officer regarding deposit of this amount. It is seen that the assessee has not raised this issue before the learned CIT(Appeals). […]
MOL Corporation Vs DCIT (International Taxation) Circle (ITAT Delhi) Bench is of considered view that the cloud base services do not involve any transfer of rights to the customers in any process. The grant of right to install and use the software included with the subscription does not include providing any copy of the said […]
Efacec Switchgear India P. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee submitted that since tools, dies, jigs etc. are used by the appellant for its business of manufacturing switchgear products, the same are plant & machinery. Without these equipments it is not possible for appellant to manufacture switchgear products. Hence, the same are in the nature of […]
K.S. Nutrition and Food Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Assessee, inter alia, submitted that the Assessing Officer was not justified in assuming jurisdiction u/s. 153C of the Act in the present case, as the assessment year under consideration does not come within the compass of the block of six assessment years, if it is […]
With regard to the evidentiary value of data recovered from computer in the form of digital data and other documents listed in earlier part of this order is concerned, section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act, permits the authorised officer to seize books of accounts and other documents.
Bishnupur Public Education Institute Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Kolkata) The adjudicating authorities under the Income Tax Act are quasi-judicial authorities. They can grant approval with retrospective effect if such mechanism is provided in the Act. There is no such provision nor there is any power to condone the delay after considering the reasonable reasons. A […]
Yogesh Mehra Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Co-ordinate Bench has given categorical finding that all these loans and advances given to different companies by other companies are in the nature of loans and advances out of commercial consideration and business expediency. The co-ordinate Bench has given detailed reasons which stated that company has purchased land in […]
Atulbhai Ravjibhai Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Regarding the issue raised with respect to the excess disallowance of Rs.14,16,000/- be deleted as it is attributed due to arithmetic error, the assessee by way of his submission submitted that there was a typographical error in reporting the details of the employees’ contribution to PF in the […]
Wanbury Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT find that during the year, the assessee has not earned any exempt income and further assessee denied that it has incurred any expenditure. Now therefore it is mandatory on part of the learned assessing officer to record a satisfaction that the claim of the assessee is not correct. […]
ITO Vs Rahul Bharatbhushan Jain (ITAT Ahmedabad) Therefore, for applicability of s. 40A(3) of the Act, if a person makes different payments in cash to same person in excess of Rs 20,000 (w.e.f. A.Y. 2018-19 Rs 10000/-) in a single day even though on separate cash memos, such aggregate payment will be disallowed u/s 40A(3). […]
