ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad allowed Section 54F deduction, holding that completion certificate was not required where evidence established cons...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata upheld deletion of business expenditure disallowance, holding that nil sales did not establish business closure and r...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai deleted the addition under Section 69 holding that mere time gap between cash withdrawal and redeposit cannot justify...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that an assessment under Section 143(3) is void where the mandatory notice under Section 143(2) was issued by an...
Income Tax : ITAT Jabalpur deleted Section 270A penalty, holding that an excess Section 80G deduction claim was a bona fide mistake and not mis...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
ITAT Pune held that difference between average price of sugar sold in the market and that sold to members at concessional rate is appropriation of profit or not needs re-consideration. Accordingly, matter restored.
ITAT Mumbai held that interest income earned by the assessee on account of surplus funds placed in FD is eligible for deduction under section 10AA of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT, held that if assessee voluntarily declares income during a survey and later includes it in their regular income tax return, no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be imposed.
ITAT Chennai held that depreciation towards payment as non-compete fee for purpose of business of assessee is duly allowable.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance u/s 14A untenable as AO has mechanically applied rule 8D without having recorded his satisfaction or examining the nature of investments whether they have yielded any exempt income or not.
ITAT Bangalore held that depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act is allowable only when the asset is put to use for the business purpose. Notably, the onus is on the assessee to prove that the assets are put to use for the business purposes only.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that as the revenue from selling of bandwidth business of the assessee is shared between the assessee and its parent company, profits eligible to deduction under section 80IA(4)(ii) of the Income Tax Act is reducible.
ITAT Cuttack held that addition towards the unexplained investment for SBN deposits during demonetization period sustained in absence to establish source of the same without documentary evidences.
ITAT Rajkot held that the capital contribution made by the partner of the firm cannot be subject to the addition in the hands of the partnership firm.
ITAT Kolkata held that invoking deeming provisions under section 50C and adopting value of property as per Stamp Valuation authority without referring the matter to Departmental Valuation Officer unsustainable. Accordingly, matter restored to jurisdictional Assessing Officer.
