ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed Section 147 reassessment as the Section 148 notice was issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed assessments as Section 143(2) notices were issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CBDT Instructi...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment after holding that the Section 143(2) notice was issued by an ACIT lacking jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held JDA capital gains taxable in the completion certificate year, allowed Section 54/54F relief, and deleted deeme...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
ITAT Mumbai rules against penalty under Sec 271G for a diamond trader’s failure to provide segmental information, emphasizing substantial compliance.
ITAT Delhi resolves Boeing India’s transfer pricing dispute, clearing an INR 21,52,899 adjustment tied to operational inactivity and a merger with BCIL.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Ralsons Infrastructure, emphasizing consistency in revenue recognition method as key to valid tax assessment for AY 2016-17.
Mumbai ITAT rules in favor of S.K. Ventures, ensuring taxpayers’ right to Sec 80IB deduction is protected despite e-filing technical issues for AY 2017-18.
Delhi ITAT rules management fee on ECB falls under ‘interest’ as per Sec 2(28A), exempt under India-Germany DTAA Art.11, aiding Aka Ausfuhrrkreditgesellschaft MBH.
ITAT Kolkata rules service tax collected for rendering services does not form part of gross receipts under Sec 44BBA, benefiting Cathay Pacific Airways.
Mumbai ITAT reinstates appeal due to CIT(A)’s failure to consider case merits in Rajkumar Anandchand Jain Vs DCIT, emphasizing proper legal procedures.
ITAT Mumbai rules Sec 68 invoked only if taxpayer can’t explain credits in books, highlighting the importance of genuine transactions for AY 2011-12, 2012-13.
Rajkot ITAT finds BSNL not in default for TDS on discounts to distributors, emphasizing correct TDS rates compliance for AY 2009-10. Appeals allowed.
Ahmedabad ITAT allows Amikrupa Education Trust’s appeal, ruling cash deposits during demonetization with explained sources not taxable under Section 69A.
