ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Patna allowed deduction for interest on delayed sales tax, service tax and employer's PF, disallowed TDS interest, and remand...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed Section 147 reassessment as the Section 148 notice was issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed assessments as Section 143(2) notices were issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CBDT Instructi...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment after holding that the Section 143(2) notice was issued by an ACIT lacking jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held JDA capital gains taxable in the completion certificate year, allowed Section 54/54F relief, and deleted deeme...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Detailed analysis of Finastra International Financial Systems PTE Ltd. Vs ACIT(International Taxation) case where ITAT Delhi ruled that software sales to Indian entities are not taxable under Article 12(3) of India-Singapore DTAA.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s decision in Bawa Float Glass Ltd Vs DCIT regarding the absence of DIN in statutory approval under section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
In a landmark decision, ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, stating that a fraud mobile number cannot deny tax treaty benefits. Full text of the order included.
Delve into the detailed analysis of DCIT Vs AD2PRO Media Solutions Pvt. Ltd. case where marketing services rendered by a US entity in India were deemed not taxable, offering insights into tax benefits.
ITAT Mumbai rules an unsigned assessment order against Reuters Asia Pacific Ltd. invalid, clarifying Section 292B of Income Tax Act doesn’t cure this defect.
ITAT Bangalore rules income from credit facilities to nominal members of a Co-operative Society exempt under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai rules that comparables cannot be excluded if their financial data can be reasonably extrapolated, in Syngenta Services Private Limited’s case.
ITAT Bangalore rules deduction under Section 80P of Income Tax Act requires filing of return of income, dismissing Madhu Souharda Pathina’s appeal.
Explore the case of Gundarlahally Ramesh Meera Vs ITO as ITAT Bangalore directs readjudication due to delay in filing appeal before lower authorities.
ITAT Bangalore rules receipts from the sale of online videos by Plural Sight LLC to Indian clients are not taxable as ‘Royalty’ under India-USA DTAA.
