This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 164 Disqualification Does Not Vacate Office in Defaulting Company: Karnataka HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dilipraj Pukkella Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Dilipraj Pukkella Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court)
The Karnataka High Court first allowed IA No.1/25 and condoned the delay of four days in filing the review petition. The petitioners sought review of the order dated 25.07.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.3465 of 2021 (GM-RES) and requested appropriate consequential reliefs.
The petitioner contended that certain material aspects relating to Sections 164 and 167 of the Companies Act had not been brought to the Court’s notice during the earlier hearing. It was submitted that the statutory scheme distinguishes between a defaulting co...
Author Info
