ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed Section 147 reassessment as the Section 148 notice was issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed assessments as Section 143(2) notices were issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CBDT Instructi...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment after holding that the Section 143(2) notice was issued by an ACIT lacking jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held JDA capital gains taxable in the completion certificate year, allowed Section 54/54F relief, and deleted deeme...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
ITAT Chandigarh ruled on Ashish Sood Vs DCIT case, deciding whether Foreign Tax Credit is eligible when Form 67 is filed after due date but before assessment.
ITAT Delhi held that Rule 128(9) nowhere debars claim of Foreign Tax Credit on account of delay in furnishing Form No. 67. The provisions contained under Rule 128(9) are directory and accordingly, allowed the credit of FTC.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on tax treatment for Smt. Pashiben Prajapati Trust, clarifying the application of Section 164 and deductions under Chapter VI-A.
Summary of cross appeals involving VAT disallowances under Section 43B for AY 2018-19, addressing accounting methods, CIT(A) decision, and case law reliance.
The ITAT Indore remanded Amit Vyas’ appeal back to CIT(A) due to procedural delays, allowing reconsideration of unexplained cash deposits and assessment orders.
ITAT Indore remands case of District Organiser Tribal Welfare Bhopal vs. ITO for incorrect TDS calculations and procedural delays. Read the full judgment summary.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that restriction of addition to Rs. 1.45 crore from Rs. 9 crore towards unexplained cash credit on account of share application money by CIT(A) justified as the same was based on evidences.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not leviable as AO had not demonstrated any falsehood in the particulars provided by assessee. Mere making a claim that was not legally sustainable did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by assessee.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that it is mandatory for the AO to refer the valuation to the DVO if the assessee objects to the adoption of the stamp duty value and claims that the value adopted exceeds the fair market value.
ITAT Bangalore held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) for non-payment of an amount equal to the amount of advance tax unjustified as assessee has explained good and sufficient reason for not paying the amount.
