Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held morphed obscene images are a serious attack on a woman's privacy and dignity. It directed prompt police action and ...
Corporate Law : The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the acquittal after finding the relationship was consensual. A later refusal to marry did not e...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC ruled that cyber crime investigations must comply with BNSS requirements, including furnishing the FIR and specifying...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC held that a bank lawfully froze an account on cyber crime investigation directions and advised the petitioner to purs...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that where TDR is used across all buildings, proportionate land conveyance based on built-up area is permissible de...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC upheld five-year disqualification after finding failure to supply committee meeting minutes within the statutory period ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court quashed a GST assessment order issued nearly four years after the assessee's death. It held that proceedings...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Hon’ble Orissa High Court Admitted the Writ Petition Filed By CTBA against Faceless Appeal Scheme The Cuttack Tax Bar Association (Life Member of AIFTP) filed the Writ Petition against the Notification of Union Government for Faceless Appeal Scheme bearing W.P.(C) No.33457 of 2020, which was listed for hearing in the Court of Hon’ble Chief Justice […]
Tirpthamoyee Aluminium Products Vs State of Tripura (High Court Tripura) According to the petitioner, due to a clerical error the distance from the place of origin to the ultimate destination i.e. from Howrah to Agartala, was shown as 470 Kms. instead of actual distance which was 1470 Kms. The petitioner would point out that as per […]
National Alumini Vs Dy. Commissioner (Orissa High Court) It is seen under Section 43 (2) of the OVAT Act the levy of penalty in the event of turnover escaping assessment, or under assessement, is not automatic. The AO has to be satisfied that escapement or under assessment of tax “is without reasonable cause”. Further upon […]
Morde Foods Pvt. Ltd. & another Vs Union of India & Others (Bombay High Court) The question is that if the declarant had filed an appeal before the appellate forum and such appeal was finally heard on or before 30th day of June, 2019; whether the declarant would be eligible to make a declaration under […]
When the law requires that no application for refund shall be rejected without giving an applicant an opportunity of being heard, the same cannot be substituted by telephonic conversations and exchange of e-mails.
OSTRO Anantapura Private Limited vs State of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Pradesh High Court) Coming to the aspect of violation of principles of natural justice clamored by the petitioner, the impugned order as well as the counter refers to certain notices. So far as CTO (Int), ATP Form VAT 304 dated 12.06.2016 (reference No.2 in the […]
The DGCA is directed to reflect, forthwith, on its website, prominently, the instructions containing the guidelines and protocols to be followed by passengers and in-flight crew in domestic flights. This shall be reflected on the main website of the DGCA, without requiring the person accessing the site to navigate through various links to reach the instructions.
CIT Vs Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd. (Madras High Court) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the proceeds realized by the assessee on sale of Certified Emission Reduction Credit, which the assessee had earned on the Clean Development Mechanisam in its wind energy operations, is a […]
In case of a works contractor who entered in to the contract before the introduction of GST, he is liable to pay tax applicable to the previous VAT regime only but the differential tax liability (GST) has to be borne by the awarder.
Concerning the scope of section 254, ignoring the material already on record on the part of Tribunal was a mistake apparent on the face of the record. Thus, Tribunal had rightly recalled its order and rectified the mistake and it had rightly set aside the additions under Section 68.
