Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Bombay HC disposed of Revenue appeals below ₹50 lakh, holding the CBDT exception added on 20 August 2018 applies prospectively, ...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana HC upheld Section 153C notices, holding the satisfaction note was not belated and limitation objections should fi...
Income Tax : Madras HC held that merely issuing a corrigendum acknowledging the return did not rectify the defective assessment process and ord...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC held that it could not direct parallel investigations when the same FIR was already under consideration before the Karna...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Counsel for the petitioner namely Smt Khusboo Devi has tried to address the Court while riding a scooter. The Court therefore declines to hear him. He should be careful in future even if the hearing is to take place through video conferencing.
M/s Vimal Petrothin Private Limited. Vs Commissioner, CGST and others (Uttarakhand High Court) Petitioner’s electronic credit ledger cannot be blocked for any period in excess of one year, in view of express provision contained in Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 86(A) of C.G.S. T. Rules. Thus, he submits that petitioner’s contention to this extent is correct […]
Best India Tobacco Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (Andhra Pradesh High Court) The important aspect for consideration in this writ petition is when the assessee files declaration under Karvivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 (for short, ‘the KVS scheme’) i.e., whether the tax refund should be adjusted towards the arrears of the tax proper first and balance […]
Statutory dues, which came within the meaning of ‘operational debt’, could be claimed against the Corporate Debtor only under the provisions of the IB Code and not under any other law. Assessee was diercted to make payment of the statutory dues from the date of purchase of the subject vehicles by assessees, which would be made subject to other proceedings in relation to the said vehicles since assessees, being the auction purchasers, could not be asked to make payment of the statutory dues claimed against the Corporate Debtor in liquidation in respect of vehicles prior to their date of purchase by assessees.
Yasho Industries Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) DGGI Officers entitled to issue summons under Section 70 of CGST Act An inquiry was initiated and summons were issued against the assessee to give evidence and produce the documents in connection with the inquiry initiated for alleged incorrect IGST refunds. This petition was filed […]
Assessable person cannot be denied access to vital piece of evidence which can prove him innocent in the eyes of law by the department. Further, since this was not done, adverse inference must be necessarily drawn against the Respondent.
M/s. Bharat Aluminium Company limited Vs Union of India and others (Chhattisgarh High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the notice was served on petitioner vide Annexure P-1 dated 01.07.202020 wherein an Input Tax Credit as claimed by the petitioner was 95464.59 lakhs and 2A GST, ITC Form was of 86606.67 in […]
ARS Steels & Alloy International Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) GST Landmark Case Law: Hon. Madras HC – Section – 17(5)(h) of CGST Act – No Reversal of ITC in Respect of Loss of Inputs During a Manufacturing Process The petitioners are engaged in the manufacture of MS Billets and Ingots. […]
NFAC should follow and apply the decision of jurisdictional High Court having jurisdiction over Assessing Officer. Any relief should not be refused to assessee by NFAC merely because there was some conflicting decision of non-jurisdictional High Court.
Reviving of assessee’s case after 18 years, the Opposite Parties had acted unreasonably particularly since assessee could not have reasonably expected that the proceedings against it would be kept alive for these many years without any action being taken and also, assessee could not be expected to preserve its records for these many years and to be able to answer a SCN after 18 years.
