Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : The Court quashed criminal proceedings after finding that the petitioner had ceased to be a director before the due date for filin...
Income Tax : Having regard to the gravity of the allegations, the ongoing investigation, the requirement of further probe into digital and fina...
Income Tax : The Orissa High Court ruled that an ITAT appeal cannot be dismissed merely because the authorised representative violated the virt...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC directed the State to determine and reimburse differential GST arising from GST implementation on works contracts, su...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC held tobacco remains unmanufactured where no new product emerges, setting aside higher compensation cess demand and recl...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Abhishek Banerjee Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Delhi High Court) With regard to the allegation of mala fide it would be apposite to note that the same is to be established to a specific assertion on the basis of proven facts and not on the basis of conjectures and surmises. The burden of establishing mala fide […]
J.K Infratech Vs Additional Commissioner (Allahabad High Court) In this case it transpires, the GST registration cancellation order dated 17.9.2019 was passed ex-parte pursuant to a notice claimed to be served through the common portal. The petitioner could not reply to the same as he claimed lack of knowledge. Thereby, ex-parte order was passed on […]
Pushpam Reality Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these impugned assessments orders have been passed either without proper service of Show Cause Notices or without giving adequate opportunity to reply to the Show Cause Notices. It is therefore submitted that the impugned orders have been passed […]
Kulgaon Badlapur Nagar Parishad Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II (Bombay High Court) HC held that There is a purpose behind prescribing a limitation period to prefer an Appeal, by way of a statutory provision under any enactment. It is a period which is rightfully allocated to the aggrieved party to prefer an Appeal or […]
Precious Trade Link Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax under Bureau of Investigation (Calcutta High Court) In this writ petition, petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 29th January, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax, Bureau of Investigation, North Bengal, Alipurduar Zone/Respondent No.2 on the ground that the said […]
D. S. Radhika vs. The State of Tamilnadu & others (Madras High Court) It is common knowledge that people of all ages, groups, background, regions, states, cities & villages in our country are obsessed with mobiles. This obsession has increased with free calls, free messages, free whatsApp, free twitter, free Facebook, free unlimited mobile data […]
Pankaj Goel Vs Union of India (Patna High Court) HC held that The entire community is aggrieved if the economic offenders, who ruin the economy of the State are not brought to book. A murder may be committed in the hit of moment upon passions being aroused. An economic offence is committed with cool calculation […]
Explore the legal implications of the non-establishment of GST Tribunal in Uttar Pradesh, leaving dealers remediless. Key questions referred to a Larger Bench.
Capital Gain credited to Capital Reserve Account instead of Profit & Loss Account cannot be considered while computing Book Profit for the provision of Section 115JB( MAT).
State Tax Officer, Bureau of Investigation (North Bengal) Vs Surinder Kumar Kotnala & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) 1. This intra Court appeal is directed against the interim order dated 25th November, 2021 in W.P.A. No.16096 of 2021 filed by the respondent nos.1 and 2 herein. The respondent nos.1 and 2 had challenged an order passed […]
