Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLAT has rejected an appeal by Technio Business Solutions, citing a lack of credible reasons for a 172-day delay in refiling. NCLAT found the explanations to be baseless.
The NCLAT has dismissed an appeal by Saurabh Premprakash Chugh, upholding a lower court’s decision that his second insolvency application was barred by res judicata.
NCLT Hyderabad has ordered the liquidation of Neocortex Life Sciences Pvt Ltd after the Resolution Professional cited non-cooperation from creditors and a lack of assets.
The Allahabad High Court has nullified tax orders and demands against a company, ruling that all pre-existing claims are extinguished once a CIRP resolution plan is approved.
NCLT Mumbai admitted application u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] for initiating CIRP against Corporate Debtor since operational creditor duly established existence of operational debt and default.
NCLAT Delhi held that extension of limitation u/s. 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 not admissible since there was no acknowledgement by Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, rejection of application under section 9 rightly rejected as time barred.
NCLAT Delhi held that order rejecting application for intervention under section 65 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is set aside and intervention petition is revived since application is not filed to derail CIRP. Accordingly, appeal disposed of.
The NCLAT has set aside a Section 7 insolvency proceeding after the Corporate Debtor repaid the full pending amount, ruling that such proceedings are not valid once the debt is settled.
NCLT Mumbai admitted CIRP application filed u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by operational creditor [Unisafe Fire Protection Specialists India Pvt. Ltd.] against Corporate Debtor [Digizone Technology Private Limited] since application is complete and default is proved.
The NCLT Mumbai has ruled that Section 14 of the IBC does not prevent banks from classifying a company’s account as fraud, even while the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is pending. The tribunal dismissed a petition by the Resolution Professional of Rolta India.
