Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The 2026 amendment replaces internationally accepted valuation standards with standards notified by the Board through circular. It strengthens regulatory control over valuation in personal guarantor bankruptcy cases.
The 2026 amendment revises the definition of “fair value” to include all assets and underlying synergies and requires appointment of two sets of registered valuers. It introduces a structured mechanism for computing fair and liquidation values.
The IBBI has inserted an explanation in Regulation 3 requiring registered valuers to prepare reports and maintain documentation as per a format notified by the Board. The amendment takes effect from publication in the Official Gazette.
The amendment replaces earlier valuation rule references with standards notified by the regulator through circulars. It centralizes control over valuation in liquidation proceedings.
The 2026 amendment revises the definition of fair value to include tangible, intangible assets and underlying synergies, and mandates a structured multi-valuer mechanism. It also prescribes clearer timelines and introduces safeguards where valuation estimates differ significantly.
The Disciplinary Committee held that reconstituting the Committee of Creditors without authority and filing contradictory affidavits misled the Adjudicating Authority. The IP’s registration has been suspended for three years.
The Appellate Tribunal held that no further contempt proceedings were warranted over 2023 publications. It noted the delay and pendency of related civil proceedings before the High Court.
The High Court set aside a GST order confirming ITC demand under Section 74 as the authority failed to consider the petitioner’s defence based on IBC moratorium. The matter was remanded for fresh hearing.
The Discussion Paper proposes enhanced recording of CoC deliberations, rationalised CIRP costs, and safeguards against related-party influence. Legislative backing is suggested for certain reforms.
The Court held that spectrum licences are sovereign privileges, not proprietary assets under IBC. This limits creditor claims and shifts disputes to telecom regulatory forums.
