Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 34(5) is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory precondition for challenging an arbitra...
Corporate Law : A Constitution Bench held that courts can modify arbitral awards in limited situations such as correcting manifest errors and seve...
Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that applications to extend an arbitral tribunals mandate under Section 29A must be filed before the Court ...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court held that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the Tribunal ignored invoices showin...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked where the prescribed limitation period expires befo...
Company Law : The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders' Agreement does not automatically require dispute...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court held that dismissal of a Section 34 petition on maintainability grounds effectively amounts to refusal to se...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Delhi High Court clarifies that seeking extension under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act does not waive the right to challenge arbitrator’s ineligibility. Detailed analysis provided.
National Highways Authority of India Vs Trichy Thanjavur Expressway Ltd. (Delhi High Court) The Delhi High Court, in a landmark judgment delivered on August 21, 2023, in the case of National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) vs. Trichy Thanjavur Expressway Ltd. (TTEL) (Appeal Number: O.M.P. (COMM) 95/2023), delved into the power of courts to partially […]
Allahabad High Court has referred a crucial question regarding the power to grant time extensions in arbitration proceedings to a larger bench. This question arises from conflicting interpretations of Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Delhi High Court allows partial setting aside of an arbitral award under Section 34, emphasizing independent component validity in NHPC Ltd vs Jaiprakash Associates case.
Explore the Calcutta High Court’s decision in Kamal Kishore Mimani vs. Ajay Mimani, highlighting the intricacies of enforcing arbitration awards and the limits of judicial intervention.
Delhi High Court clarifies that referring disputes to arbitration doesn’t prevent examination of stamp duty issues in writ petitions. Learn about the court’s stance on stamp duty in legal documents.
Bombay High Court held that just because modified Clause 96 of the General Conditions of Contract states that the decision given by the Committee shall be final and binding upon the parties, the modified clause 96 constitutes the Arbitration Agreement between the parties
Delhi High Court ruling states that once a party receives the payable amount under an arbitral award, they cannot challenge it further. Detailed analysis of K S Jain Builders vs Indian Railway Welfare Organization case.
Explore the intricacies of time limits in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Understand the impact of the Limitation Act, 1963 on filing appeals, contesting awards, and initiating proceedings. Delve into recent court decisions, exclusions, and extensions, providing crucial insights for legal practitioners and stakeholders.
The respondents contended that the petitioner, being a financial institution under the SARFAESI Act, should exclusively resort to the statutory remedies provided by the Act, and arbitration should not be permissible. This article explores the court’s reasoning and its impact on the dispute resolution landscape.
