Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : Explores how arbitration is often perceived as confidential, but legal and public interest obligations frequently limit this priva...
Company Law : The MCA now mandates e-Adjudication for corporate penalties, streamlining notices, filings, and orders. This reform accelerates co...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : Despite arguable points raised, the Supreme Court declined interference since arbitration had commenced before a senior arbitrator...
Corporate Law : The Court held that designation of New Delhi as the arbitration venue amounts to the juridical seat, conferring supervisory jurisd...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether interim protection lapses if a Section 11 petition is filed beyond 90 days. The Supreme Court held that arbi...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether the High Court could interfere with an arbitral award upheld under Section 34. The Supreme Court held that S...
Corporate Law : Rejecting objections on non-existence of the arbitration clause, the court applied the doctrine of separability. Arbitration was h...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Lease Plan India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Rudraksh Pharma Distributor & Ors.: Delhi HC confirms sufficiency of service via email & WhatsApp in arbitration proceedings.
Analysis of Dhansar Engineering Company Private Limited vs Eastern Coalfields Limited case by Calcutta High Court regarding the validity of a policy circular as an arbitration clause.
Explore Allahabad High Court’s judgment on predeposit under Section 19 of MSMED Act in the case of Docket Care Systems Vs. Hariwill Electronics. Analysis and implications discussed.
It is not open to a party to presume for himself any disqualification, which may be incurred by an Arbitrator and straightway approach High Court without giving an opportunity to Arbitrator to rebut the same.
Learn about Karnataka High Court’s ruling on excluding period of stay in arbitral tribunal proceedings for calculating twelve-month limitation under Section 29A(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rani Constructions Pvt Ltd vs Union of India: Delhi High Court rules membership of an arbitral institution is not mandatory to invoke arbitration, setting a precedent.
Delve into the jurisdictional complexities of Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. vs. Uma Earth Movers case as Calcutta High Court adjudicates concurrent jurisdiction and arbitration clauses.
Read the detailed analysis of the Delhi High Court’s decision to set aside an arbitral award in the case of Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt Ltd. vs Samtel Display Systems Ltd. Learn about the contradictory findings and legal implications.
Delhi High Court rules validity of arbitration notice under Section 21 cannot be challenged for wrong address, appoints arbitrator for dispute resolution.
Delhi HC dismisses an application under Section 27 of the Arbitration Act, directing the Arbitral Tribunal to assess evidence relevancy prima facie.
