Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 34(5) is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory precondition for challenging an arbitra...
Corporate Law : A Constitution Bench held that courts can modify arbitral awards in limited situations such as correcting manifest errors and seve...
Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that applications to extend an arbitral tribunals mandate under Section 29A must be filed before the Court ...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court held that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the Tribunal ignored invoices showin...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked where the prescribed limitation period expires befo...
Company Law : The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders' Agreement does not automatically require dispute...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court held that dismissal of a Section 34 petition on maintainability grounds effectively amounts to refusal to se...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Explore the necessity of expanding access to international arbitration, its benefits, challenges, and implications for global dispute resolution in this in-depth analysis.
Telangana High Court mandates reasoned decisions in disputes over due amounts under the Arbitration Act. Analysis of PBSAMP Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs HLV Limited case.
Delhi High Court’s judgment clarifies that IBC proceedings don’t preclude court jurisdiction for Section 11 applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Delhi HC mandates Central Registrar to appoint an arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act in a dispute between Appolo Handloom and All India Handloom.
Exploring Game Theory in International Arbitration & Third-Party Funding: A Strategic Analysis. Delve into the nuances of funding dynamics, regulatory gaps, & economic efficiency. Learn how transparency and ethical standards shape arbitration outcomes. #Arbitration #GameTheory
Learn about mediation settlement agreements, their importance, components, advantages, and drawbacks. Understand their enforceability and implications for conflict resolution.
Delhi High Court validates arbitration clause in hyperlinked terms and conditions, emphasizing their enforceability in online agreements and digital transactions.
Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective immediately.
The court examined the legal provisions and previous judgments, emphasizing the disqualification of an arbitrator with an interest in the outcome of the dispute. It noted that the unilateral appointment of the arbitrator by the Government of Kerala, a party to the dispute, violated legal principles established by the Supreme Court. Therefore, the appointment was deemed legally invalid.
Bombay High Court’s ruling on Cardinal Energy vs. Subramanya Construction explores the power of Arbitral Tribunals to include non-signatories to arbitration agreements.
