This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Striking the Balance: Limits of Judicial Intervention in Arbitration Awards
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kamal Kishore Mimani Vs Ajay Mimani (Calcutta High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Calcutta High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Kamal Kishore Mimani Vs Ajay Mimani (Calcutta High Court)
In a recent decision by the Calcutta High Court, the case of Kamal Kishore Mimani vs. Ajay Mimani sheds light on the delicate balance between enforcing arbitration awards and maintaining the integrity of the arbitral process. This case delves into the intricacies of consent awards, the jurisdiction of arbitrators, and the role of courts in rectifying deficiencies.
At the heart of the dispute was a consent award issued in an arbitration case. The award debtor, however, raised objections to its executability, citing the a...






