This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 148 Notice Void Ab Initio if Issued by Non-Faceless Officer: ITAT Hyderabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramesh Sistla Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ramesh Sistla Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Reassessment Proceedings Collapse as ITAT Emphasizes Mandatory Faceless Regime – Jurisdictional AO Has No Power After CBDT Notification
Hyderabad ITAT delivered a detailed & significant ruling on the legality of reassessment proceedings post-29.03.2022.
Assessee had not filed a return u/s 139. Based on information about substantial bank deposits, AO issued a notice u/s 148A(b) on 23.03.2022 (pre-notification). However, on 07.04.2022, the order u/s 148A(d) & subsequently the notice u/s 148 were both issued by the Jurisdictional As...







