Court holds that a single SCN covering several years is valid under Section 74 of the CGST Act, as fraudulent ITC claims often span multiple periods.
This guide explains the concept, calculation formula, and notified values of CII from 2001-02 to 2025-26, as per CBDT. A must-read for taxpayers and investors calculating capital gains.
The Allahabad High Court set aside multiple GST show cause notices and assessment orders issued against a firm whose proprietor was already deceased, ruling that proceedings for tax determination cannot be initiated against a dead person but must be directed towards the legal representatives.
ITAT Upholds Taxpayer Rights, Limits Section 148 Reassessments on Net Income: ITAT confirmed that income tax reassessments must be based on net taxable income, not gross sale proceeds. Notices issued beyond the three-year window without exceeding ₹50 lakh threshold are invalid.
The Mumbai ITAT restricted the disallowance for purchases from hawala parties to 25% of the bogus purchase amount, affirming the material was genuinely received and sold, despite fictitious invoices. The ruling relies on the Gujarat High Court’s precedent in Vijay Proteins.
Madhya Pradesh High Court rules that share of profit from taxable AOPs cannot be taxed again in the member’s hands, upholding ITAT’s order in Principal Commissioner vs. Ramesh Chandra Rai.
ITAT confirmed that a company can validly exercise the concessional tax regime under Section 115BAA through a revised return filed within the due date. Regular business losses and unabsorbed depreciation remain eligible for set-off.
Mumbai ITAT ruled in favor of Dosti Realty Limited, deleting a ₹2.06 Crore expense disallowance made under Section 154. The Tribunal held that the AO’s contradictory finding of “under assessment” invalidates rectification jurisdiction, and the expense, based on actual estimation, was not a contingent liability.
The ITAT Agra set aside the NFAC’s order confirming a Rs. 22,01,000/− cash deposit addition, citing the NFAC’s failure to follow earlier verification directions and admitting new legal grounds under the NTPC principle.
Delhi High Court upholds CESTAT’s refusal to impose higher penalty under Section 114AA on freight forwarder Mayank Gupta in Red Sandalwood export case, citing limited role.
