Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Apollo Tyres Ltd Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Apollo Tyres Ltd Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court) Reopening of assessment beyond four years was unsustainable as non-filing of Form 3CL did not constitute non-disclosure of material facts. Conclusion: Form 3CL was not a determinative document for claiming deduction, and non-production of the same did not amount to wilful non-disclosure or suppression of material facts under Explanation 1 to Section 147. The reopening of assessment beyond four years was therefore invalid and time barred. Held: Assessee claimed a deduction under Section 35(2AB) for the assessment year 2009-10. In the approval grante...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031