Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 147 Proceeding without reporting reasons for reopening is unsustainable

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2022 taxguru.in 3213
Case Name
Sh. Ghasi Lal Gurjar Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2009-10
Advertisement


Sh. Ghasi Lal Gurjar Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Held that the department has failed to issue notice, failed to report the reasons for reopening the case and also failed to take the approval of the appropriate authority before as initiation of proceedings u/s 147 of the I.T. Act. Appeal allowed on technical ground.

Facts-

The assessment in the case of the assessee was completed u/s 144 by the AO and addition was made under LTCG at Rs. 92,70,000/- for the sale of land. During the course of the appellant proceeding before CIT(A) the assessee filed additional evidence.

AO stated that the assessee had sold a land on 08-05-2008 for consideration of Rs.86,40,000/- the value of which has been taken by the Collector (Stamps), Jaipur at Rs.98,40,000/- for stamp purposes. The land was situated within the municipal limit of Jaipur Nagar Nigam, thus, the land has been ascertained as a capital asset in the meaning of Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act,1961 and as per provisions of section 50-C of the amount of Rs.98,40,000/- was liable to tax under Capital Gain Tax. Therefore, believing that the income to the tune of Rs.98,40,000/-has escaped assessment, initiated proceedings U/s 147 of the IT Act,1961 by issue of notice U/s 148 on 08-11-2013. The notice was duly served upon the assessee on 14-11-2013.

As no return was filed, notice u/s 142(1) was issued on 25-11-2014 i.e., after a year. Thereafter, assessment order in his case was passed u/s 147/144 on 03-03-2015 determining total income of Rs. 92,70,000/-.

Conclusion-

We have observed that the department has failed to issue notice, failed to report the reasons for reopening the case and also failed to take the approval of the appropriate authority before as initiation of proceedings u/s 147 of the I.T. Act. These facts is not controverted by the ld. DR appearing on behalf of the revenue. Therefore, since the notice is not legally issued, the proceedings also not valid in the eye of law and thus, these additional technical grounds of the assessee is allowed without going into merits of the case. The appeal of the assessee is thus, allowed on technical grounds.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT JAIPUR

These are the two appeal filed by the assessee aggrieved from the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)- III, Jaipur [ here in after referred as Ld. CIT(A) ] both for the assessment year 2009-10. The relevant details of the same is extracted herein below:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.