This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Mumbai Upholds Bogus Purchase Addition in Hawala Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vinod Omprakash Kainya Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Vinod Omprakash Kainya Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, has upheld the addition of Rs. 74,61,350 to the income of Vinod Omprakash Kainya, ruling that 25% of the assessee’s claimed total purchases were fictitious and arose from hawala transactions. The decision, pronounced on May 28, 2025, dismisses the assessee’s appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2010-11, citing an absence of evidence to rebut the findings of the tax authorities.
The present appeal challenged th...





