Case Law Details
Case Name : Vinita Nitin Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinita Nitin Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
No Section 69A Addition Merely Due to Time Gap Between Cash Withdrawal and Redeposit; Salaried Employee Not Required to Maintain Cash Book for Explaining Cash Deposits; ITAT Quashes Unexplained Cash Addition as Revenue Failed to Prove Alternate Use of Withdrawals.
Summary: In Vinita Nitin Chaudhary Vs ITO, the Delhi ITAT deleted an addition of ₹12.08 lakh made under Section 69A for cash deposits during the demonetization period, holding that the deposits were sufficiently explained through earlier withdrawals from the assessee’s own bank accou...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

