Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hamasamani Silks Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Hamasamani Silks Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

No Defect in Books, No Section 68- When Books Are Clean, Additions Can’t Stand — ITAT Deletes Cash Deposit Addition- Audited Books Prevail — Cash Deposits Accepted as Genuine

Assessee, a silk saree trader, deposited cash during the year-including the demonetisation period-& AO added ₹40,32,500 u/s 68, treating it as unexplained, merely because cash deposits in AY 2017-18 exceeded those in AY 2016-17. Books were audited u/s 44AB, & 95% of sales were in cash, generating large cash balances duly reflected i

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Quashes U/s 143(3) Assessment for Want of U/s 153C Jurisdiction ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Sale Receipt ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271FAA Penalty for SFT Delay Second OGE Non-Est; Two U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 Orders for Same AY Invalid – Revenue Appeals Dismissed by ITAT Bangalore ITAT Chandigarh Allows Sec 80P(2)(d) Deduction – 31 Oct Due Date Applies Due to Statutory Audit View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728