Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs PVR Inox Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs PVR Inox Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

The only issue in dispute was whether Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges paid by PVR Inox were subject to TDS u/s 194C or 194I. CIT(A) had held that CAM charges are contractual in nature and fall u/s 194C, not 194I.

The Tribunal noted that this very issue had already been decided in the assessee’s favour in its own earlier years (AYs 2011–12 & 2012–13), where the ITAT held:

  • Lease rentals are covered under Section 194I (rent).
  • CAM charges, being separate operational/maintenance services, fall under Section

    Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalty Cannot Survive on Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition: ITAT Deletes 271(1)(c) Escapement Below ₹50L: ITAT Quashes 148 Notice Issued After 3 Years Ex-Parte 144 Assessment Discovered After Bank Freezing – Fresh Opportunity Granted Reopening Beyond 3 Years: ITAT Quashes 148 Notice Approved by Wrong Authority Commission to Relatives Not Automatically Bogus: ITAT Bangalore Grants Relief  View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031