Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pramod Subbiahnapalya Venkatpathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pramod Subbiahnapalya Venkatpathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Common Satisfaction Note for Multiple Years Invalid – Separate Satisfaction U/s 153C Required for Each AY: ITAT Bangalore The ITAT Bangalore held that recording a single consolidated satisfaction note for multiple assessment years is invalid for initiating proceedings u/s 153C, and separate satisfaction must be recorded for each assessment year based on incriminating material. In the present case, a search was conducted in the premises of a charitable trust and related persons. Based on seized material, the AO issued notices u/s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031