Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pramod Subbiahnapalya Venkatpathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pramod Subbiahnapalya Venkatpathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Common Satisfaction Note for Multiple Years Invalid – Separate Satisfaction U/s 153C Required for Each AY: ITAT Bangalore The ITAT Bangalore held that recording a single consolidated satisfaction note for multiple assessment years is invalid for initiating proceedings u/s 153C, and separate satisfaction must be recorded for each assessment year based on incriminating material. In the present case, a search was conducted in the premises of a charitable trust and related persons. Based on seized material, the AO issued notices u/s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Kerala HC: Mechanical ITAT Orders Set Aside – Fresh Adjudication Ordered ITAT Rajkot: Addition Based on ‘Dump Excel Sheet’ Deleted – No Evidence, No Tax Pay Now, Not After Appeals – SC Enforces Immediate Indemnity ITAT Rajkot: Hybrid Seed Company’s Income Held as Agricultural ITAT Rajkot: Mechanical Approval Invalid – Reopening U/s 148 Quashed View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930