Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pramod Subbiahnapalya Venkatpathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pramod Subbiahnapalya Venkatpathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Common Satisfaction Note for Multiple Years Invalid – Separate Satisfaction U/s 153C Required for Each AY: ITAT Bangalore The ITAT Bangalore held that recording a single consolidated satisfaction note for multiple assessment years is invalid for initiating proceedings u/s 153C, and separate satisfaction must be recorded for each assessment year based on incriminating material. In the present case, a search was conducted in the premises of a charitable trust and related persons. Based on seized material, the AO issued notices u/s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

80P Relief Largely Allowed – Interest on Investments Held Eligible, Staff Loan Interest Taxable Nominal Members No Bar for 80P Deduction—ITAT Allows Relief & SBI Interest Expense Set-off Late Form 10B Filing Not Fatal—ITAT Allows Exemption if Audit Report Filed Before Processing Wrong Invocation of Section 153C- ITAT Quashes Assessments Where Assessee Was Himself Searched ITAT Limits Its Directions – Excludes Comparables Due to Improper Remand to DRP View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930