Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ND Developers Private Ltd. Vs Ritesh Raushan (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ND Developers Private Ltd. Vs Ritesh Raushan (Karnataka High Court) Cheque Dishonour Due to Subsequent Freezing of Drawer’s Bank Account – S.138 NI Act Not Attracted: Karnataka HC The Karnataka High Court held that prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be sustained when the cheque is dishonoured due to debit freezing of the bank account by police investigation, and not due to insufficiency of funds. In the present case, the complainant had purchased a flat under a No-Pre-EMI scheme from the developer company. Due to delay in handing over possession, the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Mumbai: No Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) on Estimated Bogus Purchase Additions ITAT Mumbai: Sec 54 Claim Cannot Be Denied Merely for No Original Return-Allowed in Reassessment SC: Partnership Cannot Be Used to Mask Illegal Sub-Lease; Courts Will Lift the Veil ITAT Mumbai: On-Money Addition Based on Third-Party Evidence Excel Sheets Deleted Third-Party Excel Sheets & Statements Without Corroboration Have No Evidentiary Value View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930