Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ND Developers Private Ltd. Vs Ritesh Raushan (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ND Developers Private Ltd. Vs Ritesh Raushan (Karnataka High Court) Cheque Dishonour Due to Subsequent Freezing of Drawer’s Bank Account – S.138 NI Act Not Attracted: Karnataka HC The Karnataka High Court held that prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be sustained when the cheque is dishonoured due to debit freezing of the bank account by police investigation, and not due to insufficiency of funds. In the present case, the complainant had purchased a flat under a No-Pre-EMI scheme from the developer company. Due to delay in handing over possession, the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930