Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amann Sadiq Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Amann Sadiq Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Assessee provided KYC services to One97 Communications Ltd. & filed his return for AY 2018–19 declaring receipts of ₹96,82,565, based on Form 26AS available at the time of filing. Later, Form 26AS was updated in Feb 2019, showing additional receipts of ₹16,18,485, representing invoices dated April & May 2018 pertaining to AY 2019–20.

AO added this difference as unreported receipts in AY 2018–19. CIT(A) confirmed the addition.

Before ITAT, Assessee showed that:

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Routine Business Cash Deposits Not Taxable Despite No ITR Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition Overturned for Earlier Property Booking Revenue’s Section 68 Challenge Rejected on Evidence and Repayment Advance Loss Treated as Trading Loss: ITAT Allows ₹1.5 Cr Write-Off Finance Broker Taxed Only on Brokerage as No Evidence of Income Found View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031