Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashutosh Dubey Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashutosh Dubey Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) No Addition, No “Under-Reporting” – ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty When Income Returned u/s 148 Was Fully Accepted The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Ashutosh Dubey vs ITO held that penalty u/s 270A for under-reporting of income cannot survive when the income declared by the assessee in response to notice u/s 148 was accepted without any addition by the AO. In this case, the assessee had not originally filed the return u/s 139(1). Based on information in Form 26AS, the AO issued notice u/s 148, pursuant to which the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031